Skip to main content

JS Solar vs Q-Cells - solar panel manufacturer comparison

JS Solar
China Founded 2011
Read the JS Solar review
VS
Q-Cells
South Korea Founded 1999 Tier 1
Read the Q-Cells review
At a glance

JS Solar has the broader catalog (137 vs 89 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
137 89
Highest power
670 Wp 675 Wp
Best efficiency
22.4% 23.2%
Average efficiency
20.0% 21.2%
Bifacial share
9% 39%
Average warranty
25 yrs 27 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
JS Solar
Founded
2011
Headquarters
Jinhua, China
Q-Cells

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Founded
1999
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Annual capacity
11.2 GW/year
Employees
2000+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric JS Solar Q-Cells
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 137+48 89
Max Power 670 W 675 W+5 W
Avg Power 430 W 468 W+38 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 22.45% 23.20%+0.75 pp
Avg Efficiency 20.03% 21.21%+1.18 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.335%/°C -0.325%/°C+0.010
Bifacial Share 12 (9%) 35 (39%)+31 pp
Avg Warranty 25.1 yrs 27.0 yrs+1.8 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)

JS Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (39%)

Q-Cells cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (43%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

JS Solar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2007 and headquartered in Yixing, Jiangsu Province. The company reports annual module shipments above 3 GW and has stated manufacturing capacity reaching toward 20 GW, though independent verification of that upper figure is limited in publicly available industry sources. Its Tier 1 or BloombergNEF bankability classification has not been confirmed in the major surveys reviewed. Hanwha Q CELLS, by contrast, is the solar division of South Korea's Hanwha Group and traces its cell-technology lineage to the original German Q-Cells business acquired in 2012. It carries confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, operates manufacturing facilities across South Korea, Malaysia, and the United States, and has reported combined production capacity of over 11 GW per year. Q CELLS has the considerably stronger institutional footprint of the two.

JS Solar offers a broad catalog spanning residential rooftop and commercial ground-mount applications, with panel wattages reaching up to roughly 670 W, a bifacial product range, and a standard 25-year performance warranty - positioning the brand as a value-oriented option for cost-sensitive commercial or utility developers. Q CELLS is best known for its proprietary Q.ANTUM PERC technology, which has accumulated a long field-performance track record, and the company has publicly announced TOPCon and tandem perovskite lines in its roadmap. Its product range targets premium residential rooftops and mid-to-large commercial installations, and its Georgia manufacturing operation - the largest solar module factory in the Western Hemisphere - makes it especially relevant for U.S. buyers seeking domestic supply chain compliance under current trade policy.

For a typical buyer in 2025 who prioritizes documented bankability, an extensive field-performance history, and U.S. manufacturing options, Q CELLS is the more defensible default. JS Solar can be a competitive choice where upfront cost is the primary driver and project financing does not require a confirmed Tier 1 supplier, but buyers should verify its current bankability standing before committing to a large installation.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-21

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
JS Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Q-Cells
Manufacturers
JS Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Q-Cells
Manufacturers
JS Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Q-Cells
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 25 Q-Cells offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.