Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Shinson Technology - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Shinson Technology
China Founded 2010
Read the Shinson Technology review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 105 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Shinson Technology leans bifacial (62% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 105
Highest power
735 Wp 720 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 23.2%
Average efficiency
22.2% 20.5%
Bifacial share
36% 62%
Average warranty
29 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Shinson Technology

Shinson Technology is a leading professional supplier in the renewable energy industry, specializing in the production and distribution of high-quality PV modules, completed PV kits, and energy storage solutions. With a commitment to sustainable energy solutions, they strive to provide innovative and reliable products...

Founded
2010
Headquarters
Changzhou, China
Annual capacity
10+ GW/year
Employees
500+
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Shinson Technology
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+532 105
Max Power 735 W+15 W 720 W
Avg Power 523 W+45 W 477 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+1.57 pp 23.23%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+1.64 pp 20.54%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C+0.010 -0.314%/°C
Bifacial Share 231 (36%) 65 (62%)+26 pp
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs+1.0 yr 27.7 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Shinson Technology cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (40%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, listed on the NYSE and holding confirmed Tier 1 bankable status. With a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees, Jinko shipped approximately 92.9 GW of modules in 2024, placing it at the very top of global manufacturer rankings alongside LONGi. Shinson Technology, founded in 2010 and also based in China, operates at a considerably smaller scale with a declared production capacity exceeding 10 GW and a team of 500+ employees. Shinson does not carry publicly confirmed Tier 1 status, which limits its accessibility to projects requiring bankable manufacturer certification from institutional lenders. Both companies position TOPCon as their leading cell technology, but the gap in market reach, scale, and financial track record is substantial.

Jinko Solar's portfolio of 545 panels, with an average power of 511 Wp and average efficiency of 22.0%, covers virtually every application from residential rooftop installs to utility-scale ground-mount projects. Its maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and warranty averaging 28.5 years make it highly competitive for commercial C&I procurement and large-scale tenders where long-term performance guarantees are critical. Shinson's 105-panel portfolio averages 477 Wp with a 20.5% average efficiency, but stands out in one meaningful area: 61.9% of its modules are bifacial, compared to just 31.9% for Jinko - a notable differentiator for ground-mount installations with reflective surfaces or flat industrial and warehouse rooftops where rear-side gain is achievable. Shinson's slightly weaker temperature coefficient (-0.314%/°C vs. -0.308%/°C for Jinko) is a marginal disadvantage in hot-climate deployments, while warranty terms are comparable at 27.7 years average.

For international buyers prioritizing supply chain security, bankability, and a proven global service network, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice and a straightforward fit for utility-scale, commercial, and residential projects alike. Shinson Technology may appeal to buyers seeking a high bifacial share at potentially competitive pricing, or to smaller regional distributors looking for more flexible commercial terms. Any procurement involving Shinson should carefully account for the absence of Tier 1 certification, particularly where project financing from banks or institutional investors is part of the equation.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-09

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Shinson Technology
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Shinson Technology
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Shinson Technology
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.