Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Rarlon PV Tech - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Rarlon PV Tech
China
Read the Rarlon PV Tech review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 52 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 52
Highest power
735 Wp 550 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 21.5%
Average efficiency
22.2% 18.3%
Bifacial share
36% 0%
Average warranty
29 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Rarlon PV Tech

Rarlon PV Tech, also known as Rarlon Solar, has specialized in the solar field for over 10 years. They are a professional manufacturer and supplier of green energy products, engaging in the production and installation of solar panels, solar systems, and solar projects. Their products are exported to various countries...

Headquarters
Ningbo, China
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Rarlon PV Tech
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+585 52
Max Power 735 W+185 W 550 W
Avg Power 523 W+172 W 351 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+3.30 pp 21.50%
Avg Efficiency 22.18%+3.85 pp 18.33%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C+0.135 -0.439%/°C
Bifacial Share 231 (36%)+36 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs+3.7 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Rarlon PV Tech cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (77%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar and Rarlon PV Tech are both Chinese solar panel manufacturers, but they occupy vastly different positions in the global market. Founded in 2006 and listed on the NYSE, Jinko Solar is one of the world's largest PV manufacturers with an annual module production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,000 employees. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status and was ranked the most bankable PV brand by BloombergNEF for ten consecutive years, achieving a 100% bankability rating in 2024. With approximately 13% global market share and 86 GW shipped in 2025, Jinko is a dominant force in the industry. Rarlon PV Tech, headquartered in Ningbo, is a significantly smaller manufacturer with over 15 years of experience in the solar sector and TUV, CE, and ISO9001 certifications, but it does not appear in any major bankability or Tier 1 rankings. Its portfolio consists of 52 panel models, compared to Jinko's 545.

On a technology level, Jinko Solar leads with a strong TOPCon (N-type) offering - its top cell technology - across nearly 40% of its portfolio, delivering an average module efficiency of around 22% and a maximum of 24.8%. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.308%/°C and approximately 32% bifacial product share make it well-suited for utility-scale ground-mount projects, commercial and industrial (C&I) rooftop systems, and high-performance residential installs. Maximum panel output reaches 735 Wp. Rarlon PV Tech, by contrast, relies heavily on PERC technology (around 77% of its portfolio), with an average efficiency of approximately 18.3% and a maximum of 21.5%. Its average temperature coefficient of -0.439%/°C represents a notable disadvantage in warmer conditions, and the portfolio contains no bifacial products. The maximum panel output stands at 550 Wp, with an average of around 351 Wp - reflecting a more entry-level product range.

For international buyers and project developers choosing between the two, Jinko Solar is the clear choice for any project requiring bankable equipment, project finance, or insurance-grade warranties - with an average warranty term of approximately 28.5 years versus Rarlon's 25. Rarlon PV Tech may be considered for small, cost-constrained off-grid or residential systems in markets where Tier 1 bankability is not a prerequisite, but buyers should factor in the higher technology gap and limited independent review data when assessing long-term reliability.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Rarlon PV Tech
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Rarlon PV Tech
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Rarlon PV Tech
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 160 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.