Jinko Solar vs Mogen Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 5 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Mogen Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 130.0 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
Jinko Solar was founded in 2006 in China and has grown into the world's largest solar panel manufacturer by cumulative shipment volume, listed on the NYSE with over 33,830 employees and a production capacity of 130 GW. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status - reflecting strong financial standing and independently verified creditworthiness - which is a critical requirement for project financing in most markets. Mogen Solar is a considerably smaller Chinese manufacturer without Tier 1 status, offering a tightly focused portfolio of just 5 panel models. The gap in market footprint is significant: Jinko Solar shipped 86 GW in full-year 2025 alone and has surpassed 390 GW in cumulative deliveries, while Mogen Solar operates at a much smaller scale with an estimated production capacity of around 3 GW.
Jinko Solar's portfolio spans 545 models, with maximum power output reaching 735 Wp and peak module efficiency of 24.8%, achieved through its Tiger Neo TOPCon N-type series. Approximately 39% of its lineup uses TOPCon technology, with an average portfolio efficiency of 22.0% and an average temperature coefficient of Pmax of -0.308%/°C. About 32% of Jinko's portfolio is bifacial, and the average warranty term across the range stands at over 28 years. This breadth makes Jinko well suited for residential rooftop installs, utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications alike. Mogen Solar, by contrast, focuses exclusively on bifacial TOPCon panels - 100% of its 5-model lineup - with a maximum power of 435 Wp, average power of 424 Wp, and average efficiency of 21.5%. The fully bifacial approach positions Mogen Solar primarily for ground-mount or flat-roof commercial installations where rear-side irradiance can meaningfully boost energy yield.
For international buyers comparing these two manufacturers, Jinko Solar is the lower-risk choice across virtually all project types. Its Tier 1 status, deep warranty structure, large production capacity, global supply chain, and eleven consecutive years of PVEL Top Performer recognition provide the confidence required for financed and long-term projects. Mogen Solar may appeal to cost-sensitive buyers seeking a fully bifacial TOPCon option for specific niche ground-mount applications, but the absence of Tier 1 bankability, a very limited product range, and low independent market visibility make it a less suitable choice for large-scale, financed, or long-horizon installations.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 155 Jinko Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.