Jinko Solar vs Luxor Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 121 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Luxor Solar leans bifacial (69% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.
- Founded
- 2006
- Headquarters
- Shanghai, China
- Annual capacity
- 130.0 GW/year
- Employees
- 33,830
- Listed
- NYSE: JKS
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+
Luxor Solar offers more 600W+ panels (29% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (38%)
The flagships
Written summary
Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 in China and listed on the NYSE, is one of the world's largest solar module manufacturers, with a total module production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status, making it a preferred supplier for project finance and institutional investors globally. With 545 panel models in its portfolio and cumulative global shipments exceeding 300 GW, Jinko secured the top position in global module rankings in H1 2025. Luxor Solar, headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany, was founded in 2007 and operates at a considerably smaller scale, offering 121 panel models without a Tier 1 bankable rating. While Luxor lacks Jinko's global reach, its German base gives it a distinct and trusted presence in Central European markets. Both manufacturers offer comparable average panel efficiencies - approximately 22.0% for Jinko and 22.2% for Luxor - and average product warranties of around 28 years.
Jinko Solar's flagship Tiger Neo series, built on n-type TOPCon cell technology, achieves a maximum panel efficiency of 24.8% and a peak power output of 735 Wp, backed by a world-record TOPCon cell efficiency of 27.79% verified by Germany's ISFH. Approximately 39% of Jinko's portfolio uses TOPCon cells, while around 32% of its panels are bifacial - a configuration best suited to utility-scale ground-mount and commercial C&I projects where bankability, supply scale, and proven reliability are the primary decision factors. Luxor Solar's portfolio places a much stronger emphasis on bifacial modules, with roughly 69% bifacial coverage, and its leading technology is HJT, representing about 38% of its catalog. Luxor's HJT panels deliver an average temperature coefficient of -0.301%/°C, slightly better than Jinko's -0.308%/°C, making them particularly attractive for residential rooftop installations, agrivoltaic systems, and bifacial ground-mount setups where rear-side irradiance capture and low-light performance matter.
For international buyers, the choice ultimately hinges on project scale and risk profile. Jinko Solar is the stronger option for utility-scale and C&I developers requiring Tier 1 bankability, broad module availability, and a verified global track record across hundreds of gigawatts. Luxor Solar suits European buyers who prioritize proximity to German engineering support, a high bifacial share, and competitive HJT technology - particularly for residential and mid-scale commercial projects where Tier 1 status is less critical to financing.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-09
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers · See 9 Luxor Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.