Skip to main content

Jinko Solar vs Luxen Solar Energy - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
VS
Luxen Solar Energy
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the Luxen Solar Energy review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 151 models). Luxen Solar Energy leans bifacial (52% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
637 151
Highest power
735 Wp 720 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 24.8%
Average efficiency
22.2% 22.4%
Bifacial share
36% 52%
Average warranty
29 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Luxen Solar Energy

Luxen Solar is a global company dedicated to the production and sales of high-power, low-attenuation solar photovoltaic modules. The company was founded in Spain and has since established manufacturing facilities and branches in various countries. Luxen is recognized as a Tier 1 manufacturer by BloombergNEF and is...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Suzhou, China
Annual capacity
3 GW/year
Employees
500+
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Jinko Solar Luxen Solar Energy
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 637+486 151
Max Power 735 W+15 W 720 W
Avg Power 523 W 567 W+44 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80% 24.80%
Avg Efficiency 22.18% 22.42%+0.24 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.304%/°C -0.293%/°C+0.011
Bifacial Share 231 (36%) 78 (52%)+15 pp
Avg Warranty 28.7 yrs 29.6 yrs+0.9 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Luxen Solar Energy offers more 600W+ panels (43% of lineup)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

Luxen Solar Energy cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (81%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Jinko Solar and Luxen Solar Energy are both Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturers holding Tier 1 bankable status with BloombergNEF, yet they occupy vastly different positions in the global solar industry. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 and listed on the New York Stock Exchange, consistently ranks as one of the world's largest PV module suppliers by shipment volume, backed by a production capacity of 130 GW and a workforce of over 33,800 employees. The company has accumulated over 300 GW of cumulative global installations and holds 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer. Luxen Solar Energy, founded a year earlier in 2005, is a considerably smaller operation with a production capacity of 3 GW and a staff of over 500 people. Despite its smaller footprint, Luxen holds Tier 1 status and serves customers across more than 90 markets worldwide.

On the technology side, Jinko Solar leads with a broad portfolio of 545 panel models, of which approximately 39% feature N-type TOPCon cell technology - delivering a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and a peak power output of 735 Wp. Roughly 32% of Jinko's catalog is bifacial, making the brand a natural fit for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where bifacial energy gain and high unit output are decisive factors. The average temperature coefficient of Pmax across Jinko's range is -0.308%/°C, and the average product warranty spans approximately 28.5 years. Luxen Solar Energy, by contrast, offers a compact lineup of 15 models dominated by PERC technology at around 67% of the portfolio, with a maximum efficiency of 22.28% and no bifacial options in the current catalog. Luxen's average Pmax temperature coefficient is -0.33%/°C and the average warranty runs approximately 26.7 years. The brand's positioning suits residential rooftop installs and smaller commercial projects where a reliable, straightforward PERC module meets the requirement without the need for advanced bifacial or high-power configurations.

For international buyers evaluating the two, Jinko Solar is the stronger choice when technology diversity, global service infrastructure, and scalability across project sizes are priorities - particularly for utility-scale or large C&I deployments. Luxen Solar Energy can be a cost-effective option for residential or small commercial buyers seeking a Tier 1 certified product, but the limited model range, absence of bifacial offerings, and smaller global support footprint are meaningful considerations in markets where long-term warranty execution and local service presence carry significant weight in procurement decisions.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Luxen Solar Energy
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Luxen Solar Energy
Manufacturers
Jinko Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Luxen Solar Energy
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers · See 3 Luxen Solar Energy offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.