Skip to main content

JA Solar vs Sungrow - solar panel manufacturer comparison

JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
VS
Sungrow
China Founded 1997 Tier 1
Read the Sungrow review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 0 models). JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
504 0
Highest power
740 Wp 0 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% -
Average efficiency
21.1% -
Bifacial share
47% 0%
Average warranty
28 yrs -
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Sungrow

Sungrow (Sungrow Power Supply Co., Ltd.) is the world's leading manufacturer of solar PV inverters and energy storage systems, headquartered in Hefei, Anhui, China. Founded in 1997, the company specializes in string and central inverters, wind converters, floating PV systems, and utility-scale battery storage...

Founded
1997
Headquarters
Hefei, China
Employees
15000-20000
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric JA Solar Sungrow
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 504+504 0
Max Power 740 W+740 W 0 W
Avg Power 456 W+456 W 0 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80% -
Avg Efficiency 21.13% -
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.322%/°C -
Bifacial Share 238 (47%)+47 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 27.9 yrs -

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

Sungrow cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
Sungrow all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

JA Solar and Sungrow are both Chinese manufacturers listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, but a direct comparison between them is inherently asymmetric: JA Solar is one of the world's leading solar module manufacturers, while Sungrow is primarily a global inverter and energy storage systems manufacturer with no solar panel product line (panel count in its portfolio: 0). JA Solar was founded in 2005, employs over 37,000 people, and operates annual production capacity exceeding 100 GW. Its catalog spans 524 module models reaching up to 740 Wp peak power and a maximum efficiency of 24.4%, with an average portfolio efficiency of approximately 20.9%. The dominant cell technology is PERC, representing over 52% of the lineup, alongside a growing TOPCon range. Roughly 44% of the portfolio is bifacial. JA Solar holds Tier 1 bankable status and earned the PVEL "Top Performer" distinction for the tenth consecutive year in 2025. Sungrow, founded in 1997 with 15,000-20,000 employees, is ranked among the top two global inverter manufacturers, holding approximately 30% of global market share and shipping 198 GW of inverters in 2025. The company is rapidly scaling its energy storage division, whose revenue surpassed inverter revenue for the first time in 2025.

In practical terms, the two companies serve complementary roles within a solar installation rather than competing head-to-head. JA Solar modules are well-suited to residential rooftop installs where power density and long product warranties matter - the average warranty across its portfolio approaches 28 years. Its broad format range, from compact residential panels to high-power 700+ Wp formats, also makes it a strong contender for commercial C&I projects and utility-scale ground-mount arrays. Sungrow, on the other hand, is the relevant choice at the inverter and battery storage layer, with string inverters, hybrid inverters, and grid-scale storage systems that consistently rank among the most deployed globally. Sungrow is also building its first manufacturing facility outside Asia in Poland, which will improve supply chain proximity and after-sales service across Central Europe.

For an international buyer or project developer, these two brands are best viewed as partners in a system rather than alternatives - JA Solar panels paired with a Sungrow inverter represent a well-documented, bankable combination backed by two of the most financially robust Chinese solar manufacturers active in global markets today.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
JA Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Sungrow
Manufacturers
JA Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Sungrow
Manufacturers
JA Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Sungrow
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 386 JA Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.