Skip to main content

JA Solar vs SMA Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
VS
SMA Solar
Germany Founded 1981
Read the SMA Solar review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 0 models). JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
504 0
Highest power
740 Wp 0 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% -
Average efficiency
21.1% -
Bifacial share
47% 0%
Average warranty
28 yrs -
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
SMA Solar

SMA Solar Technology AG is a leading German manufacturer of solar inverters for photovoltaic systems, serving residential, commercial, and utility-scale applications worldwide. Founded in 1981, the company is the largest solar technology company in Europe by revenue and operates in over 190 countries. SMA focuses...

Founded
1981
Headquarters
Niestetal, Germany
Employees
3000-5000
Listed
ETR: S92
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric JA Solar SMA Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 504+504 0
Max Power 740 W+740 W 0 W
Avg Power 456 W+456 W 0 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80% -
Avg Efficiency 21.13% -
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.322%/°C -
Bifacial Share 238 (47%)+47 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 27.9 yrs -

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

SMA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
SMA Solar all models
No panels from this manufacturer are in the database yet.
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

JA Solar and SMA Solar operate in the photovoltaic industry but occupy entirely different segments, making a direct product comparison essentially impossible. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in China, is one of the world's largest solar panel manufacturers, with a production capacity exceeding 100 GW and a workforce of over 37,000 employees. The company holds Tier 1 bankable status, confirming its financial credibility with lending institutions and project financiers globally. Its portfolio spans more than 520 panel models, with a maximum module output of 740 Wp, an average portfolio efficiency of approximately 20.9%, and a peak efficiency of 24.4%. It is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE). SMA Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1981 in Kassel, Germany, and is primarily a manufacturer of solar inverters and energy management systems - not solar panels. The company carries zero panel products in its lineup and is listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (ETR). SMA ranks among the top three solar inverter manufacturers globally according to Wood Mackenzie's H1 2025 rankings, and is the highest-placed inverter supplier headquartered outside China, with approximately 144 GW of installed inverter capacity worldwide.

For solar panel applications - whether residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, or utility-scale ground-mount systems - JA Solar is the relevant product manufacturer of the two. Its PERC technology dominates the portfolio at roughly 52% of offerings, with TOPCon gaining ground in higher-efficiency lines. Over 44% of its modules are bifacial, making them well-suited for ground-mount installations with reflective surfaces. The average product warranty across its portfolio approaches 28 years, which is above the industry norm. SMA Solar's value lies entirely on the inverter and system integration side, where its string inverters, hybrid inverters, and large-scale commercial solutions are widely deployed across European and global markets. In 2025, SMA faced headwinds including weak residential and commercial demand in Germany and pricing pressure from Asian competitors, prompting a restructuring that included roughly 350 job cuts.

For international buyers evaluating these two companies as panel suppliers, the comparison is moot - SMA Solar does not manufacture panels, while JA Solar does not manufacture inverters. A project deploying JA Solar modules with SMA inverters is a common and complementary pairing rather than a competitive choice. Buyers selecting a panel brand should evaluate JA Solar on its own merits against other Tier 1 module manufacturers, while inverter selection is a separate decision where SMA competes against Huawei, Sungrow, Fronius, and others.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
JA Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar SMA Solar
Manufacturers
JA Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO SMA Solar
Manufacturers
JA Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar SMA Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 386 JA Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.