Skip to main content

JA Solar vs RMCIP - solar panel manufacturer comparison

JA Solar
China Founded 2005 Tier 1
Read the JA Solar review
VS
RMCIP
Russia Founded 1963
Read the RMCIP review
At a glance

JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 1 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. JA Solar leans bifacial (47% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
504 1
Highest power
740 Wp 200 Wp
Best efficiency
24.8% 12.4%
Average efficiency
21.1% 12.4%
Bifacial share
47% 0%
Average warranty
28 yrs 25 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
JA Solar

JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...

Founded
2005
Headquarters
Beijing, China
Annual capacity
100+ GW/year
Employees
37,289
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
RMCIP

Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC (RMCIP) is a Russian industrial manufacturer established in 1963, primarily known as the only producer of sealed magnetically operated contacts (reed switches) in Russia and CIS countries. The company also manufactures crystalline silicon photovoltaic solar modules (RZMP...

Founded
1963
Headquarters
Ryazan, Russia
Annual capacity
<0.1 GW/year
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric JA Solar RMCIP
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 504+503 1
Max Power 740 W+540 W 200 W
Avg Power 456 W+256 W 200 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 24.80%+12.40 pp 12.40%
Avg Efficiency 21.13%+8.73 pp 12.40%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.322%/°C+0.078 -0.400%/°C
Bifacial Share 238 (47%)+47 pp 0 (0%)
Avg Warranty 27.9 yrs+2.9 yr 25.0 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

JA Solar offers more 600W+ panels (14% of lineup)

JA Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)

RMCIP cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture
04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

JA Solar and RMCIP represent two manufacturers operating at opposite ends of the solar industry spectrum. JA Solar, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Shenzhen, China, is one of the world's largest photovoltaic module producers. According to Wood Mackenzie's Global Solar Module Manufacturer Ranking for the first half of 2025, JA Solar jointly claimed the top position worldwide alongside Trinasolar. The company has a manufacturing capacity exceeding 100 GW, employs over 37,000 people, is listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, and holds Tier 1 status awarded by S&P Global Commodity Insights - confirming its full bankability and eligibility for project finance from institutional lenders. By mid-2025, cumulative global shipments had reached nearly 300 GW across 178 countries. RMCIP (Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC), founded in 1963 in Ryazan, Russia, is primarily known as a manufacturer of reed switches and sealed magnetic contacts for industrial and defense applications. Solar panels constitute a peripheral segment of its business, with production capacity below 0.1 GW. It holds no Tier 1 status, carries no recognized bankability rating, and lists only a single panel model at 200 Wp in the available data.

JA Solar's product portfolio spans 524 panel models, anchored by its Deep Blue series utilizing PERC technology - which accounts for approximately 52% of its lineup - alongside a growing range of higher-efficiency TOPCon modules. The maximum panel power reaches 740 Wp, peak efficiency is 24.4%, and roughly 44% of its portfolio consists of bifacial modules well-suited to ground-mount utility-scale and commercial C&I applications where rear-side irradiance gains are achievable. An average temperature coefficient of -0.32%/°C per degree Celsius is competitive for hot summer conditions, and average warranty coverage extends to nearly 28 years. JA Solar is a strong fit for residential rooftop installs, commercial rooftop systems, and large-scale ground-mounted solar farms alike. RMCIP's sole documented panel at 200 Wp uses an unspecified cell technology, has no bifacial capability, carries a 25-year warranty, and a temperature coefficient of -0.40%/°C - a notably weaker thermal performance figure. Its practical application is limited to niche off-grid or special-purpose installations in the Russian and CIS markets.

For international buyers, project developers, or installers evaluating these two manufacturers, JA Solar is the clear and straightforward choice for any grid-connected application, from residential rooftops to utility-scale farms. It offers documented reliability, broad module availability, institutional bankability, and a technically competitive product range. RMCIP has no meaningful presence outside Russia and its single-panel offering does not meet the technical or commercial expectations of modern European or global solar markets.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-13

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
JA Solar A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar RMCIP
Manufacturers
JA Solar AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO RMCIP
Manufacturers
JA Solar AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar RMCIP
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 386 JA Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.