JA Solar vs REC - solar panel manufacturer comparison
JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 58 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. REC leans bifacial (59% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...
- Founded
- 2005
- Headquarters
- Beijing, China
- Annual capacity
- 100+ GW/year
- Employees
- 37,289
- Listed
- SZSE: 002459
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+
REC offers more 600W+ panels (17% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (59%)
The flagships
Written summary
JA Solar, founded in China in 2005 and listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, has grown into one of the world's largest solar panel manufacturers with a production capacity exceeding 100 GW and a workforce of over 37,000 employees. The company consistently ranks among the top two global suppliers by shipment volume and holds Tier 1 bankable status, demonstrating the financial stability and reliability required by project finance lenders worldwide. REC Group, by contrast, was founded in Norway in 1996 and has built its reputation as a premium European-heritage brand - smaller in scale but widely respected for advanced cell technology and long-term product quality. REC also holds Tier 1 bankable status, giving it credibility across international project markets despite its more focused product range.
JA Solar's broad portfolio of 524 panel models is led by PERC cell technology (52.1% of the lineup), with an average output of 441.7 Wp and maximum efficiency reaching 24.4%. The sheer range of its offerings - from standard residential modules to high-power bifacial panels up to 740 Wp - makes it well suited for residential rooftop installs, commercial C&I projects, and large utility-scale ground-mount deployments where competitive pricing and supply reliability are priorities. REC's more concentrated portfolio of 55 models is dominated by HJT cell technology (56.4% of the lineup), delivering a maximum efficiency of 22.6% and a better average temperature coefficient of -0.306%/°C compared to JA Solar's -0.323%/°C. REC also carries a higher share of bifacial panels (56.4% vs. 44.3%), and its lower annual degradation rates make it a strong fit for space-constrained residential rooftops and premium C&I installations where long-term yield optimization justifies a higher upfront cost.
For buyers prioritizing volume, portfolio breadth, and competitive pricing - particularly across utility-scale and large C&I segments - JA Solar is a compelling Tier 1 choice backed by unmatched manufacturing scale and consistent reliability scores in independent testing. REC appeals to buyers in the premium residential and select commercial segments who value European brand positioning, advanced HJT technology, and comprehensive warranty protection including labor coverage under its ProTrust program. The right choice ultimately depends on project scale, budget constraints, and how much value a client places on incremental efficiency gains and brand premium.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 389 JA Solar offers · See 7 REC offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.