JA Solar vs Q-SUN Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison
JA Solar has the broader catalog (504 vs 111 models). JA Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Q-SUN Solar leans bifacial (68% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
JA Solar is a global leader in the manufacturing of high-performance photovoltaic products. Founded in 2005, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells solar cells and modules. JA Solar's products are used in ground-mounted power plants, commercial & industrial rooftop PV systems, and residential rooftop...
- Founded
- 2005
- Headquarters
- Beijing, China
- Annual capacity
- 100+ GW/year
- Employees
- 37,289
- Listed
- SZSE: 002459
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Qn-SOLAR officially launched its global PV business in 2022. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, China, and has four manufacturing bases in China. As a professional and integrated company, Qn-SOLAR operates in various fields of PV upstream and downstream, achieving an annual production capacity of 20GW PV cells...
- Founded
- 2014
- Headquarters
- China
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
JA Solar skews to higher efficiency: 15% of lineup is 23%+
Q-SUN Solar offers more 600W+ panels (30% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (49%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>N-type</strong> (42%)
The flagships
Written summary
JA Solar and Q-SUN Solar are both Chinese photovoltaic module manufacturers, but they occupy very different positions in the global solar market. JA Solar was founded in 2005 and has grown into one of the industry's largest players, with production capacity exceeding 100 GW, a workforce of over 37,000 employees, and a public listing on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE). It holds Tier 1 bankable status as recognized by S&P Global Commodity Insights, confirming its eligibility for bank-financed projects worldwide and placing it consistently among the top two manufacturers globally by shipment volume. Q-SUN Solar, established in 2014 in Chuzhou, Anhui Province, is a significantly smaller manufacturer delivering approximately 4 GW annually and does not currently appear on Tier 1 bankability lists. This distinction carries real implications for project financing, as installers and developers working with institutional lenders will generally find it easier to secure funding for projects built around JA Solar modules.
In terms of technology and portfolio breadth, both manufacturers demonstrate meaningful strengths. JA Solar's 524-model lineup is dominated by PERC technology (52.1% of portfolio), reaching up to 740 Wp and a maximum efficiency of 24.4%, with an average efficiency of 20.87% across all models. Its extensive range makes it equally well-suited for residential rooftop installs, large utility-scale ground-mount projects, and commercial C&I applications. Q-SUN Solar, with 114 models, leans more heavily toward N-type technology (41.2% of portfolio) and posts a higher average module efficiency of 21.89%, along with a better average temperature coefficient of -0.304%/°C versus -0.323%/°C for JA Solar, and a significantly higher share of bifacial panels at 66.7% versus 44.3%. These attributes make Q-SUN's lineup particularly competitive for high-yield utility-scale and C&I projects where per-watt output and thermal performance at elevated temperatures are priorities.
For international buyers selecting between the two, the decision ultimately hinges on risk tolerance and project requirements. JA Solar is the lower-risk, better-documented option - its Tier 1 status, PVEL Top Performer recognition, and deep global supply chain make it a defensible choice for virtually any project type. Q-SUN Solar offers a technically competitive and increasingly certified alternative with modern N-type modules and strong bifacial representation, but buyers should carefully factor in its non-Tier-1 standing when project financing or long-term bankability is a key consideration.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-09
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 389 JA Solar offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.