Skip to main content

Hyundai vs Sharp - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Hyundai
South Korea Founded 2004 Tier 1
Read the Hyundai review
VS
Sharp
Japan Founded 1912 Tier 1
Read the Sharp review
At a glance

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 19 models). Sharp leads on peak efficiency at 23.82%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
65 19
Highest power
640 Wp 740 Wp
Best efficiency
23.4% 23.8%
Average efficiency
21.5% 22.2%
Bifacial share
66% 53%
Average warranty
27 yrs 28 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Hyundai

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

Founded
2004
Headquarters
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Annual capacity
1.35 GW/year
Employees
206
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Sharp

Sharp Corporation is a Japanese electronics company founded in 1912. It operates globally, offering a wide range of products including consumer electronics, home appliances, energy solutions, and business solutions. Since 2016, it has been majority-owned by Foxconn.

Founded
1912
Headquarters
Sakai, Osaka Prefecture, Japan
Annual capacity
15.4 GW/year
Employees
40,123
Listed
TYO: 6753
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Hyundai Sharp
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 65+46 19
Max Power 640 W 740 W+100 W
Avg Power 442 W 576 W+133 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.40% 23.82%+0.42 pp
Avg Efficiency 21.49% 22.20%+0.71 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.300%/°C+0.000 -0.300%/°C
Bifacial Share 43 (66%)+14 pp 10 (53%)
Avg Warranty 27.4 yrs 27.6 yrs+0.2 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Sharp skews to higher efficiency: 32% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Sharp offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)

Hyundai cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: HJT (38%)

Sharp cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: HJT (37%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Hyundai Energy Solutions is a South Korean manufacturer headquartered in Seoul, operating as a standalone company since 2016 after being spun off from Hyundai Heavy Industries - a Fortune 500 conglomerate - though its solar activity traces back to 2004. The company produces panels in-house in South Korea and sells actively across the United States, Europe, Australia, and Asia, recently securing an approximately $85 million module supply agreement for a utility-scale project in the US. Sharp's solar history is considerably older: Japan's Sharp Corporation began mass production of solar cells in 1963, making it one of the world's earliest commercial PV producers, though today its solar operations are concentrated under Sharp Energy Solutions Corporation and focus primarily on the Japanese domestic market after Sharp withdrew from Western markets between 2012 and 2015 amid financial pressure and Chinese competition. Neither brand currently appears on the widely-cited BloombergNEF Tier 1 module list, which as of 2025-2026 is dominated by large Chinese manufacturers; Hyundai, however, carries the stronger institutional footprint in international markets.

Both companies have converged on N-Type TOPCon monocrystalline silicon as their primary cell technology, reflecting the broader industry shift away from PERC. Hyundai's lineup spans residential and light commercial rooftop applications, with a standard residential series and a bifacial variant suited to installations that can capture rear-side gain, backed by 25-year product and performance warranties. Sharp's current models - including the NU-JC435 and NU-JC440 - target residential and commercial rooftops in Japan with comparable efficiency and a notably generous 30-year performance guarantee, but their limited availability outside Japan is a meaningful constraint for most international buyers.

For buyers outside Japan, Hyundai Energy Solutions is the more practical default in 2025: panels are broadly available, supported by a large industrial parent, and competitively priced in major markets. Sharp is the stronger choice for Japanese domestic installations, where its brand recognition, long track record, and local service infrastructure carry real weight.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-03

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Hyundai A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Sharp
Manufacturers
Hyundai AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Sharp
Manufacturers
Hyundai AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Sharp
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 30 Hyundai offers · See 6 Sharp offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.