Skip to main content

Hyundai vs Mysolar USA - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Hyundai
South Korea Founded 2004 Tier 1
Read the Hyundai review
VS
Mysolar USA
China Founded 2010
Read the Mysolar USA review
At a glance

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 15 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Mysolar USA leans bifacial (100% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
65 15
Highest power
640 Wp 720 Wp
Best efficiency
23.4% 23.2%
Average efficiency
21.5% 22.4%
Bifacial share
66% 100%
Average warranty
27 yrs 30 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Hyundai

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...

Founded
2004
Headquarters
Seongnam-si, South Korea
Annual capacity
1.35 GW/year
Employees
206
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
Mysolar USA

Mysolar is a sub-brand of Mamibot, specializing in designing and manufacturing high-efficiency solar panels using state-of-the-art technology. The company aims to become a Tier 1 solar panel manufacturer, offering a wide range of modules for residential and commercial projects. Mysolar is committed to rewriting the...

Founded
2010
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
3.2 GW/year
Employees
60
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Hyundai Mysolar USA
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 65+50 15
Max Power 640 W 720 W+80 W
Avg Power 442 W 610 W+168 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.40%+0.23 pp 23.17%
Avg Efficiency 21.49% 22.42%+0.93 pp
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.300%/°C -0.283%/°C+0.017
Bifacial Share 43 (66%) 15 (100%)+34 pp
Avg Warranty 27.4 yrs 30.0 yrs+2.6 yr

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Mysolar USA skews to higher efficiency: 13% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Mysolar USA offers more 600W+ panels (67% of lineup)

Hyundai cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (38%)

Mysolar USA cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (67%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Hyundai Energy Solutions, operating under the HD Hyundai conglomerate, is a South Korean manufacturer with over two decades of solar production history. It holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status - a designation that institutional lenders use to assess module financing risk - and operates annual production capacity reported at roughly 1.4 GW. Mysolar USA is a sub-brand of Mamibot USA, a company with roots in consumer robotics that pivoted into solar manufacturing; it describes itself as aspiring to Tier 1 status but does not yet appear on major bankability lists. Hyundai carries the considerably stronger institutional footprint of the two.

Hyundai's current product lineup centers on N-type TOPCon and HJT modules aimed primarily at residential rooftops and light commercial installations, with efficiency figures confirmed by multiple independent reviewers to reach into the low-to-mid 22 percent range on its premium NF series. Pricing is generally positioned in the mid-tier bracket, competitive with but not undercutting the established Chinese giants. Mysolar USA similarly leads with HJT and shingled N-type modules, advertising outputs up to 740 W and efficiency claims approaching 23.8 percent on its GOLD bifacial line, targeting both residential installers and commercial developers. Because Mysolar's independent third-party validation is limited in publicly available sources, those headline figures should be treated with some caution until confirmed by certified lab tests.

For a typical residential buyer or commercial project requiring lender acceptance in 2025, Hyundai is the more defensible default: its Tier 1 standing removes financing friction and its long warranty track record is independently documented. Mysolar USA may suit buyers who are comfortable with a newer brand and are drawn to its HJT bifacial technology at potentially competitive price points, but the absence of BloombergNEF recognition is a meaningful gap for any project requiring bank or insurer sign-off.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-07-05

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Hyundai A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Mysolar USA
Manufacturers
Hyundai AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Mysolar USA
Manufacturers
Hyundai AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Mysolar USA
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 38 Hyundai offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.