Gamko New Energy vs Seraphim - solar panel manufacturer comparison
Gamko New Energy has the broader catalog (255 vs 160 models). Gamko New Energy leads on peak efficiency at 24.14%. Gamko New Energy leans bifacial (81% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Gamko New Energy is a professional solar module manufacturer with a 10-year experience in production and quality control since 2008. They also provide technical services for solar power plants, including design, installation, and maintenance. In 2018, their production capacity reached 2GW.
- Founded
- 2008
- Headquarters
- Nantong, Jiangsu, China
- Annual capacity
- 1.2 GW/year
- Employees
- 201-300
Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...
- Founded
- 2011
- Headquarters
- Changzhou, China
- Annual capacity
- 13 GW/year
- Employees
- 1001-5000
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
Gamko New Energy skews to higher efficiency: 40% of lineup is 23%+
Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (57%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (52%)
The flagships
Written summary
Gamko New Energy is a Chinese module manufacturer headquartered in Nantong, Jiangsu province, with production roots going back to roughly 2008 and a reported annual manufacturing capacity of around 1.2 GW as of 2023. The company holds standard industry certifications including IEC 61215 and IEC 61730, and markets panels across a wide wattage range - from small off-grid modules up to large-format bifacial units exceeding 700 W. No independent BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability designation has been confirmed for Gamko in publicly available sources, which positions it as a second-tier supplier by the standards most institutional lenders and EPC contractors apply. Seraphim - formally Jiangsu Seraphim Solar System Co., Ltd., headquartered in Changzhou - was founded in 2011 and had grown to a reported 13 GW of annual manufacturing capacity by 2024, with close to 30 GW of cumulative installations across more than 100 countries. Seraphim has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for ten consecutive years since 2015 and has been recognized as a PVEL Top Performer on five occasions, giving it a significantly stronger institutional footprint than Gamko.
In terms of product portfolio, Gamko covers the full wattage spectrum from residential rooftop panels to high-power bifacial modules using PERC and TOPCon cell technology, and also supplies flexible modules suited to niche applications. Seraphim's current lineup centers on its TOPCon-based Sable series - reaching module efficiency of around 22.95 percent - and its HJT Hydra series pushing efficiency to approximately 23.18 percent. Both ranges are designed to serve residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I), and utility-scale ground-mount segments. Seraphim's consistent presence at major trade events such as SNEC and its broad distribution agreements across Europe, Brazil, and Asia signal a more mature go-to-market operation.
For a typical international buyer - whether a residential installer seeking bankable warranties, a C&I developer requiring project financing, or a utility-scale EPC looking for lender-approved modules - Seraphim is the more defensible default choice, backed by a decade of verified Tier 1 status and a large global footprint. Buyers outside major markets should nonetheless verify local after-sales support, as warranty service limitations have been reported in certain regions. Gamko may appeal in price-sensitive, off-grid, or smaller self-funded installations where third-party bankability is not a contractual requirement, but independent long-term performance data for the brand remains limited.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-14
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 5 Seraphim offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.