Energetik vs AKCOME - solar panel manufacturer comparison
AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 0 models). AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
Energetik Solartechnologie Vertrieb GmbH is a German B2B wholesaler and distributor of photovoltaic equipment, including solar panels, inverters, and battery storage systems. The company operates under the brand powershop.online and partners with leading manufacturers such as Meyer Burger, Trina Solar, SMA, and...
- Founded
- 2012
- Headquarters
- Gütersloh, Germany
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2006 and publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange since 2010. The company has held Bloomberg New Energy Finance Tier 1 status and operates across more than 30 countries with a reported annual module production capacity of around 3.8 GW. Energetik, by contrast, returned no usable results across multiple targeted searches covering major industry sources such as PV Tech, TaiyangNews, SolarReviews, and SolarQuotes. The brand does not appear on any bankability or Tier 1 lists traceable through open sources, strongly suggesting it is a regional or emerging label with a very limited institutional footprint compared to AKCOME.
AKCOME's confirmed product offer centres on HJT and PERC technology modules, with high-wattage formats reaching into the 700 W range and reported efficiencies up to 23.5% on its HJT line. The brand has marketed residential and light-commercial products in Australia under the "Kookaburra" sub-brand, positioning itself at the budget-to-mid segment of the market. A notable development from early 2025 is that TaiyangNews removed AKCOME's entries from its TOP MODULES listing after the manufacturer's main website became temporarily inaccessible, raising questions about supply-chain continuity. No equivalent product or technology data could be verified for Energetik through credible third-party sources.
For a typical buyer in 2025, AKCOME has the clearer paper trail - documented Tier 1 history, confirmed HJT technology, and a multi-GW manufacturing base - but the early-2025 delisting flag warrants due diligence on current distributor support and warranty backstop before committing to a large order. Energetik cannot be meaningfully evaluated from publicly available industry data, and buyers should request independent third-party test reports and financial guarantees before specifying it on any project.
Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-06-08
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.