ENCOR vs Q-Cells - Solar Panel Manufacturer Comparison
ENCOR
Poland · est. 1991Q-Cells
South Korea · est. 1999
Panel models
0
vs
91
Max power
0 W
vs
635 W
Max efficiency
-
vs
23.20%
Bifacial share
0%
vs
42%
At a glance
Q-Cells has the broader catalog (91 vs 0 models). Q-Cells leans bifacial (42% of lineup).
ENCOR
Website
ENCOR is a proprietary solar brand owned by CORAB S.A., a Polish manufacturer and distributor of photovoltaic systems founded in 1991. The brand covers an ecosystem of own-label PV modules, inverters, and energy storage units produced to CORAB's specifications. CORAB is one of the largest photovoltaic mounting...
Headquarters
Olsztyn, Poland
Founded
1991
Employees
200,500
Production Capacity
-
Tier 1 Bankable
-
Stock
-
Q-Cells
Website
Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...
Headquarters
Seoul, South Korea
Founded
1999
Employees
2,000
Production Capacity
11.2 GW/year
Tier 1 Bankable
Yes
Stock
Side-by-Side Specs
winner + margin shown| Metric |
ENCOR
|
Q-Cells
|
|---|---|---|
| Catalog & Power | ||
| Panel Models | 0 | 91 +91 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 635 W +635 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 462 W +462 W |
| Efficiency | ||
| Max Efficiency | - | 23.20% |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.26% |
| Reliability & Warranty | ||
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.323%/°C |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 38 (42%) +42 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 27.1 yrs |
Top Panels Side-by-Side
Top 10 highest-power models from each brandENCOR
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No panel data available. | |||||
Q-Cells
| # | Model | Power | Eff. | T.coeff | Tech |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635 Bi | 635W | 22.7% | -0.300%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630 Bi | 630W | 22.6% | -0.300%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 625 Bi | 625W | 22.4% | -0.300%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 620 Bi | 620W | 22.2% | -0.300%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 615 Bi | 615W | 22.0% | -0.300%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 610 Bi | 610W | 21.8% | -0.300%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 605 Bi | 605W | 21.7% | -0.340%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3/BFG 605 Bi | 605W | 21.7% | -0.340%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | Q.PEAK DUO XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600 Bi | 600W | 21.5% | -0.340%/°C | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | Q.PEAK DUO RSF XL-G11S.3 / BFG 600 Bi | 600W | 21.5% | -0.340%/°C | Monocrystalline |
Top 0 panels average
Efficiency
-
Temp coeff
-
Top 10 panels average
Efficiency
22.01%
Temp coeff
-0.316%/°C
Efficiency Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by efficiency tier
Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+
Power Distribution
Share of each brand's lineup by rated power range
Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (13% of lineup)
ENCOR Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Q-Cells Cell Technology
Mix of cell technologies across the portfolio
Dominant cell tech: PERC (38%)
Disclaimer: This comparison is based on our database and may not reflect complete product lineups. Help the community by suggesting missing panels.