Skip to main content

Einnova Solarline vs Jinko Solar - solar panel manufacturer comparison

Einnova Solarline
China Founded 2008
Read the Einnova Solarline review
VS
Jinko Solar
China Founded 2006 Tier 1
Read the Jinko Solar review
At a glance

Jinko Solar has the broader catalog (637 vs 28 models). Jinko Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Jinko Solar leans bifacial (36% of lineup).

Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.

Panel models
28 637
Highest power
650 Wp 735 Wp
Best efficiency
23.3% 24.8%
Average efficiency
22.4% 22.2%
Bifacial share
7% 36%
Average warranty
30 yrs 29 yrs
01

The two companies

Company facts, not datasheet figures
Einnova Solarline

Einnova Solarline Energy Corp. Limited, established in 2008, is a leading manufacturer of solar panels in China, offering conventional and flexible modules, BIPV products, and customized solutions. The company has a global presence in over 50 countries and has been ranked among China's Top 20 Solar Module...

Founded
2008
Headquarters
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Annual capacity
2 GW/year
Employees
50+
Jinko Solar

JinkoSolar is a global leader in the solar industry, manufacturing and distributing solar products and solutions to a diversified international customer base. They have a vertically integrated solar product value chain. The company is committed to providing clean, efficient, and sustainable energy solutions worldwide.

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Shanghai, China
Annual capacity
130.0 GW/year
Employees
33,830
Listed
NYSE: JKS
Tier 1 bankable
Yes
02

Catalogue against catalogue

Averages over every model in the database
Metric Einnova Solarline Jinko Solar
Catalog & Power
Panel Models 28 637+609
Max Power 650 W 735 W+85 W
Avg Power 512 W 523 W+11 W
Efficiency
Max Efficiency 23.30% 24.80%+1.50 pp
Avg Efficiency 22.40%+0.23 pp 22.18%
Reliability & Warranty
Avg Temp Coefficient -0.320%/°C -0.304%/°C+0.015
Bifacial Share 2 (7%) 231 (36%)+29 pp
Avg Warranty 29.6 yrs+0.9 yr 28.7 yrs

An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.

03

What each of them builds

Cell technology across the market
Efficiency spread
Share of each catalogue in every efficiency band

Jinko Solar skews to higher efficiency: 29% of lineup is 23%+

Power spread
Share of each catalogue in every power band

Jinko Solar offers more 600W+ panels (26% of lineup)

Einnova Solarline cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (93%)

Jinko Solar cell technology
Share of their models by cell architecture

Dominant cell tech: <strong>TOPCon</strong> (41%)

04

The flagships

Highest-power models from each brand
05

Written summary

Checking cache...

Einnova Solarline and Jinko Solar are both Chinese solar module manufacturers, but they occupy very different positions in the global industry. Jinko Solar, founded in 2006 with over 33,800 employees and a production capacity of 130 GW, ranks among the largest solar panel producers in the world - it holds verified Tier 1 bankable status, is listed on the NYSE, and has accumulated over 300 GW of global installations with 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer. Einnova Solarline, established in 2008, is a considerably smaller company with a team of over 50 employees and a production capacity of 2 GW; the company reports a presence in more than 50 countries and counts itself among China's top 20 module manufacturers, though no Tier 1 or stock exchange listing is associated with it in available sources.

On the technology front, both manufacturers rely on TOPCon as their primary cell technology, but with markedly different portfolio compositions. Einnova dedicates 92.9% of its 28-model lineup to TOPCon, achieving an average module efficiency of 22.4% and a maximum of 23.3%, with an average warranty term of approximately 29.6 years. The company also offers BIPV products - solar tiles, facade modules, and balcony plug-and-play kits - making it a practical choice for residential rooftop installs and building-integrated architectural projects. Jinko Solar's 545-model portfolio is far broader: TOPCon accounts for 39.4% of the range, but the company reaches a maximum module efficiency of 24.8% and a peak output of 735 Wp, backed by laboratory TOPCon cell records exceeding 27% efficiency. Its bifacial panel share stands at 31.9% compared to Einnova's 7.1%, which makes Jinko a stronger fit for utility-scale ground-mount projects and large commercial C&I installations where bankability and long-term service infrastructure are critical selection criteria.

For international buyers choosing between the two, the decision hinges primarily on project scale and risk appetite. Jinko Solar offers the reliability of a Tier 1, NYSE-listed manufacturer with a deep global service network and broad product selection - the natural choice for financed or large-scale projects. Einnova Solarline may appeal to buyers seeking a highly TOPCon-focused, specialized supplier with a competitive average efficiency and a differentiated BIPV offering, provided that local warranty enforcement and after-sales support are carefully evaluated before commitment.

Generated by Claude Sonnet · 2026-05-12

06

Other brand comparisons

Build your own
Manufacturers
Einnova Solarline A.B. Energy
Manufacturers
AE Solar Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
Einnova Solarline AEET
Manufacturers
AIKO Jinko Solar
Manufacturers
Einnova Solarline AKCOME
Manufacturers
ARTsolar Jinko Solar
Something missing from a catalogue? Both lists are built from the datasheets in the database. If a model is absent, it has not been ingested yet.

Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers

Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.