CSUN vs AKCOME - solar panel manufacturer comparison
CSUN has the broader catalog (35 vs 3 models). AKCOME leads on peak efficiency at 22.54%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).
Both catalogues are read from the manufacturers' own datasheets. A brand is not scored against the market here, only against the other brand on this page.
The two companies
China Sunergy (CSUN) is a Chinese manufacturer of solar cells and photovoltaic modules headquartered in Nanjing, Jiangsu. The company produces high-efficiency mono- and multicrystalline solar cells and modules from production facilities in China and, historically, Turkey. It was formerly listed on NASDAQ and was...
- Founded
- 2004
- Headquarters
- Nanjing, China
- Annual capacity
- 2-3 GW/year
- Employees
- 1000-5000
- Tier 1 bankable
- Yes
Catalogue against catalogue
An average over a catalogue describes the range a manufacturer publishes, not the module you would buy. A brand with two flagship panels and eighty older ones averages worse than one that has retired its back catalogue.
What each of them builds
AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>PERC</strong> (94%)
Dominant cell tech: <strong>HJT</strong> (100%)
The flagships
Written summary
AKCOME is a Chinese solar module manufacturer based in Zhejiang province, historically recognized on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list with peak annual production capacity reported around 3.8 GW, later expanded with plans for additional N-type cell and module capacity at its Changxing base. However, the company's institutional standing has deteriorated sharply: a subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange terminated its listing in August 2024, and it was dropped from top-tier module tracking lists in early 2025. CSUN, also known as China Sunergy, was founded in 2006 in Nanjing and operates a smaller production footprint of roughly 2.5 GW annually, with manufacturing spread across China, the USA, Turkey, South Korea and Vietnam; it is not consistently listed on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 register despite some of its own marketing claiming Tier 1 status. Given AKCOME's recent delisting and bankruptcy proceedings versus CSUN's longer, more stable operating history since its 2010 acquisition by CEEG, CSUN currently presents the steadier institutional footprint, even though its historical Tier 1 credentials are less firmly documented.
AKCOME's product lineup has centered on TOPCon and HJT half-cut bifacial dual-glass modules, such as the SK9609TDGDC-440, with efficiencies reported up to about 22.5 percent and a 15-year product warranty, positioning the brand toward higher-efficiency residential and utility-scale bifacial applications. CSUN's catalog spans both polycrystalline and monocrystalline panels with module efficiency around 20.4 percent, a 12-year product warranty and 25-year performance warranty, and the brand is generally described as a mid-range "best value" option aimed at mass-market residential and commercial rooftops rather than premium or cutting-edge bifacial deployments.
For a typical buyer in 2025, CSUN is the more conservative default choice given AKCOME's unresolved bankruptcy proceedings, which introduce meaningful warranty continuity risk despite AKCOME's technically more advanced panel specifications. Buyers prioritizing efficiency and willing to accept elevated financial-stability risk might still consider AKCOME, but for most residential or commercial projects where long-term warranty support matters, CSUN's steadier corporate history makes it the safer, if less cutting-edge, option.
Generated by Claude Sonnet 5 · 2026-08-27
Other brand comparisons
Shop prices: See 1 CSUN offer · See 2 AKCOME offers
Comparisons are computed from manufacturer datasheets held in the ComparePV database and may not reflect a brand's complete current lineup. Nothing on this page is paid placement.