Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-490
VS
The verdict
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.50 pp more efficient. 3 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 16 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
16 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
NEG21C.20Q-760
NEG18R.28-490
Difference
Module efficiency
24.50 %
22.00 %
2.50 pp more efficient
Rated power
760 Wp
490 Wp
270 W more power
Power density
244.7 Wp/m²
220.3 Wp/m²
24.3 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight
38.3 kg
23.5 kg
14.8 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
50.90 V
39.60 V
11.30 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.85 A
15.80 A
3.05 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.224 m²
0.883 m² apart
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power
42.90 V
32.90 V
10.00 V apart
Current at max power
17.72 A
14.91 A
2.81 A apart
Cell count
264
108
156 cells apart
Weight per kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
2.4 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1961x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
NEG21C.20Q-760
25,698 kWh
NEG18R.28-490
16,440 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,258 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
NEG21C.20Q-760
NEG18R.28-490
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
760 W
490 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
730 W
469 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
701 W
447 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
671 W
426 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
NEG21C.20Q-760
NEG18R.28-490
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
760 Wp
490 Wp
+270 W for NEG21C.20Q-760
Module efficiency
24.50 %
22.00 %
+2.50 pp for NEG21C.20Q-760
Power density
244.7 Wp/m²
220.3 Wp/m²
+24.3 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20Q-760
Open-circuit voltage
50.90 V
39.60 V
11.30 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.90 V
32.90 V
10.00 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.85 A
15.80 A
3.05 A apart
Current at max power
17.72 A
14.91 A
2.81 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for NEG21C.20Q-760
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1961x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.224 m²
0.883 m² apart
Weight
38.3 kg
23.5 kg
-14.8 kg for NEG18R.28-490
Weight per kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
48.0 kg/kWp
-2.4 kg/kWp for NEG18R.28-490
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
+3 yrs for NEG18R.28-490
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for NEG21C.20Q-760
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
264
108
156 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#74
vs
#6,517
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 6,443 places
Power density
#86
vs
#6,276
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 6,190 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#2,165
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#3,780
vs
#1,984
NEG18R.28-490 leads by 1,796 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#66
vs
#7,493
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 7,427 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG19RC.20Q
8 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-490?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has higher module efficiency (24.50% vs 22.00%); Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-490?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has a module efficiency of 24.50%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-490 is 22.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-490?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 uses TOPCon cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-490 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-490?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-490 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-490 bifacial panels?
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Trina Solar TSM-NEG18R.28-490 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 250 Trina Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

