Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial
VS
The verdict
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.10 pp more efficient. 4 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 17 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
THC G12-66 Bifacial
TNC M10-78 Bifacial
Difference
Module efficiency
23.80 %
22.70 %
1.10 pp more efficient
Rated power
740 Wp
635 Wp
105 W more power
Power density
238.2 Wp/m²
227.2 Wp/m²
11.1 Wp/m² higher
Weight
37.0 kg
33.8 kg
3.2 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
50.62 V
57.20 V
6.58 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.47 A
13.82 A
4.65 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.795 m²
0.311 m² apart
Weight per kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
53.2 kg/kWp
3.2 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
42.32 V
48.05 V
5.73 V apart
Current at max power
17.49 A
13.22 A
4.27 A apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1134 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2465x1134 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
THC G12-66 Bifacial
24,828 kWh
TNC M10-78 Bifacial
21,306 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,522 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
THC G12-66 Bifacial
TNC M10-78 Bifacial
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
740 W
635 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.8% of rated power
709 W
608 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.6% of rated power
678 W
582 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.4% of rated power
647 W
555 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
THC G12-66 Bifacial
TNC M10-78 Bifacial
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
740 Wp
635 Wp
+105 W for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Module efficiency
23.80 %
22.70 %
+1.10 pp for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Power density
238.2 Wp/m²
227.2 Wp/m²
+11.1 Wp/m² for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Open-circuit voltage
50.62 V
57.20 V
6.58 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.32 V
48.05 V
5.73 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.47 A
13.82 A
4.65 A apart
Current at max power
17.49 A
13.22 A
4.27 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.280 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1134 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2465x1134 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.795 m²
0.311 m² apart
Weight
37.0 kg
33.8 kg
-3.2 kg for TNC M10-78 Bifacial
Weight per kWp
50.0 kg/kWp
53.2 kg/kWp
-3.2 kg/kWp for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.40 %/yr
Not published by Tongwei
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
-
Not published by Tongwei
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#433
vs
#3,307
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 2,874 places
Power density
#431
vs
#3,252
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 2,821 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309
vs
#1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,317
vs
#7,071
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 3,754 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#130
vs
#2,385
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 2,255 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HS
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HD
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-54HD
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial vs Tongwei TNC G12-66 Monofacial
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial or Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial?
According to our database: Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 22.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial?
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial has a module efficiency of 23.80%, while Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial use vs Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial?
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial uses TOPCon cells; Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial?
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial has a 30 years power warranty; Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial bifacial panels?
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Tongwei TNC M10-78 Bifacial is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 72 Tongwei offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.