Skip to main content
THC G12-66 Bifacial vs TWMNF-66HD 12 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD

THC G12-66 Bifacial
740 Wp 23.80 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
TWMNF-66HD
715 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

THC G12-66 Bifacial leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 12 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
12 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

6 of 18 parameters
Parameter THC G12-66 Bifacial TWMNF-66HD Difference
Module efficiency 23.80 % 23.00 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Power density 238.2 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² 8.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 740 Wp 715 Wp 25 W more power
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 53.0 kg/kWp 3.0 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 50.62 V 49.11 V 1.51 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.32 V 40.86 V 1.46 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
THC G12-66 Bifacial
24,828 kWh
TWMNF-66HD
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
838 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario THC G12-66 Bifacial TWMNF-66HD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 740 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 709 W 685 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 678 W 655 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 647 W 625 W
03

Full specification

Parameter THC G12-66 Bifacial TWMNF-66HD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 740 Wp 715 Wp +25 W for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Module efficiency 23.80 % 23.00 % +0.80 pp for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Power density 238.2 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² +8.0 Wp/m² for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Open-circuit voltage 50.62 V 49.11 V 1.51 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.32 V 40.86 V 1.46 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.47 A 18.50 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.49 A 17.50 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.0 kg 37.9 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 53.0 kg/kWp -3.0 kg/kWp for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#433 vs #1,919
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 1,486 places
Power density
#431 vs #2,018
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 1,587 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,317 vs #6,744
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 3,427 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#130 vs #450
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 320 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HS
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HD
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-54HD
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750
4 differences, the largest is product warranty
Same manufacturer
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745
2 differences, the largest is product warranty
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial or Tongwei TWMNF-66HD?
According to our database: Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TWMNF-66HD?
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial has a module efficiency of 23.80%, while Tongwei TWMNF-66HD is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial use vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD?
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial uses TOPCon cells; Tongwei TWMNF-66HD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TWMNF-66HD?
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial has a 30 years power warranty; Tongwei TWMNF-66HD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TWMNF-66HD bifacial panels?
Both Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TWMNF-66HD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 53 Tongwei offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.