Skip to main content
THC G12-66 Bifacial vs TNC G12-66 Bifacial 8 of 17 identical Swap Change panels

Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial

THC G12-66 Bifacial
740 Wp 23.80 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
TNC G12-66 Bifacial
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

THC G12-66 Bifacial leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.10 pp more efficient. 8 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
8 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

9 of 17 parameters
Parameter THC G12-66 Bifacial TNC G12-66 Bifacial Difference
Module efficiency 23.80 % 22.70 % 1.10 pp more efficient
Power density 238.2 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² 11.3 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 740 Wp 705 Wp 35 W more power
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs 3 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp 3.8 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 50.62 V 48.77 V 1.85 V apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303 mm
Voltage at max power 42.32 V 40.52 V 1.80 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
THC G12-66 Bifacial
24,828 kWh
TNC G12-66 Bifacial
23,654 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,174 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario THC G12-66 Bifacial TNC G12-66 Bifacial
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 740 W 705 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 709 W 675 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 678 W 646 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 647 W 616 W
03

Full specification

Parameter THC G12-66 Bifacial TNC G12-66 Bifacial Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 740 Wp 705 Wp +35 W for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Module efficiency 23.80 % 22.70 % +1.10 pp for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Power density 238.2 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² +11.3 Wp/m² for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Open-circuit voltage 50.62 V 48.77 V 1.85 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.32 V 40.52 V 1.80 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.47 A 18.40 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.49 A 17.40 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.0 kg 37.9 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp -3.8 kg/kWp for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs +3 yrs for THC G12-66 Bifacial
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.40 %/yr Not published by Tongwei
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 - Not published by Tongwei
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#433 vs #3,307
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 2,874 places
Power density
#431 vs #3,361
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 2,930 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,317 vs #7,811
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 4,494 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#130 vs #1,007
THC G12-66 Bifacial leads by 877 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HS
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-66HD
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-54HD
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TWMNH-48HC
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial vs Tongwei TNC G12-66 Monofacial
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial or Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial?
According to our database: Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 22.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial?
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial has a module efficiency of 23.80%, while Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial use vs Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial?
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial uses TOPCon cells; Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial?
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial has a 30 years power warranty; Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial and Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial bifacial panels?
Tongwei THC G12-66 Bifacial is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Tongwei TNC G12-66 Bifacial is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 72 Tongwei offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.