SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144
VS
The verdict
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SPV695-TG12-132BD
SPV560-PM10-144
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
22.41 %
21.69 %
0.72 pp more efficient
Rated power
695 Wp
560 Wp
135 W more power
Weight
38.0 kg
26.5 kg
11.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
54.7 kg/kWp
47.3 kg/kWp
7.4 kg/kWp lighter
Power density
224.0 Wp/m²
217.0 Wp/m²
7.0 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current
18.31 A
13.82 A
4.49 A apart
Module area
3.103 m²
2.581 m²
0.522 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
48.07 V
52.05 V
3.98 V apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Current at max power
17.28 A
13.04 A
4.24 A apart
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Voltage at max power
40.25 V
42.94 V
2.69 V apart
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2278x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 2278x1133x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SPV695-TG12-132BD
22,869 kWh
SPV560-PM10-144
18,441 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,428 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
SPV695-TG12-132BD
SPV560-PM10-144
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
695 W
560 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
664 W
531 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
632 W
501 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
601 W
472 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
SPV695-TG12-132BD
SPV560-PM10-144
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
695 Wp
560 Wp
+135 W for SPV695-TG12-132BD
Module efficiency
22.41 %
21.69 %
+0.72 pp for SPV695-TG12-132BD
Power density
224.0 Wp/m²
217.0 Wp/m²
+7.0 Wp/m² for SPV695-TG12-132BD
Open-circuit voltage
48.07 V
52.05 V
3.98 V apart
Voltage at max power
40.25 V
42.94 V
2.69 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.31 A
13.82 A
4.49 A apart
Current at max power
17.28 A
13.04 A
4.24 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for SPV695-TG12-132BD
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
2278x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 2278x1133x30 mm
Module area
3.103 m²
2.581 m²
0.522 m² apart
Weight
38.0 kg
26.5 kg
-11.5 kg for SPV560-PM10-144
Weight per kWp
54.7 kg/kWp
47.3 kg/kWp
-7.4 kg/kWp for SPV560-PM10-144
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.46 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,771
vs
#7,530
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 2,759 places
Power density
#4,779
vs
#7,429
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 2,650 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#10,419
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 4,326 places
Weight
#9,072
vs
#1,639
SPV560-PM10-144 leads by 7,433 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,358
vs
#5,929
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 4,571 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV690-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV555-PM10-144
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV550-PM10-144
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV545-PM10-144
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD or SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144?
According to our database: SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD has higher module efficiency (22.41% vs 21.69%); SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144?
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD has a module efficiency of 22.41%, while SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 is 21.69%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD use vs SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144?
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon cells; SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144?
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty; SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 bifacial panels?
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD is bifacial (captures light from both faces); SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.