Skip to main content
SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SPV685-TG12-132BD 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD

SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD
SpolarPV
SPV695-TG12-132BD
695 Wp 22.41 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD
SpolarPV
SPV685-TG12-132BD
685 Wp 22.08 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

SPV695-TG12-132BD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.33 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter SPV695-TG12-132BD SPV685-TG12-132BD Difference
Module efficiency 22.41 % 22.08 % 0.33 pp more efficient
Power density 224.0 Wp/m² 220.8 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 695 Wp 685 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
SPV695-TG12-132BD
22,869 kWh
SPV685-TG12-132BD
22,540 kWh
Lifetime gap
329 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario SPV695-TG12-132BD SPV685-TG12-132BD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 695 W 685 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 664 W 654 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 632 W 623 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 601 W 593 W
03

Full specification

Parameter SPV695-TG12-132BD SPV685-TG12-132BD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 695 Wp 685 Wp +10 W for SPV695-TG12-132BD
Module efficiency 22.41 % 22.08 % +0.33 pp for SPV695-TG12-132BD
Power density 224.0 Wp/m² 220.8 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for SPV695-TG12-132BD
Open-circuit voltage 48.07 V 47.65 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.25 V 39.83 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.31 A 18.25 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.28 A 17.21 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2383x1302x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm Same
Module area 3.103 m² 3.103 m² Same
Weight 38.0 kg 38.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.7 kg/kWp 55.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.46 %/yr 0.46 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,771 vs #6,116
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 1,345 places
Power density
#4,779 vs #6,042
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 1,263 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,072 vs #9,876
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 804 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,358 vs #1,718
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 360 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV690-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV680-TG12-132BD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV675-TG12-132BD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV670-TG12-132BD
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV665-TG12-132BD
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD or SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD?
According to our database: SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD has higher module efficiency (22.41% vs 22.08%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD?
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD has a module efficiency of 22.41%, while SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD is 22.08%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD use vs SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD?
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon cells; SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD?
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty; SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD bifacial panels?
Both SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD and SpolarPV SPV685-TG12-132BD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.