SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD
VS
The verdict
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SPV560-PM10-144
SPV695-TG12-132BD
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency
21.69 %
22.41 %
0.72 pp more efficient
Rated power
560 Wp
695 Wp
135 W more power
Weight
26.5 kg
38.0 kg
11.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
47.3 kg/kWp
54.7 kg/kWp
7.4 kg/kWp lighter
Power density
217.0 Wp/m²
224.0 Wp/m²
7.0 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current
13.82 A
18.31 A
4.49 A apart
Module area
2.581 m²
3.103 m²
0.522 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
52.05 V
48.07 V
3.98 V apart
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Current at max power
13.04 A
17.28 A
4.24 A apart
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Voltage at max power
42.94 V
40.25 V
2.69 V apart
Dimensions
2278x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2278x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SPV560-PM10-144
18,441 kWh
SPV695-TG12-132BD
22,869 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,428 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
SPV560-PM10-144
SPV695-TG12-132BD
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
560 W
695 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
531 W
664 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
501 W
632 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
472 W
601 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
SPV560-PM10-144
SPV695-TG12-132BD
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
560 Wp
695 Wp
+135 W for SPV695-TG12-132BD
Module efficiency
21.69 %
22.41 %
+0.72 pp for SPV695-TG12-132BD
Power density
217.0 Wp/m²
224.0 Wp/m²
+7.0 Wp/m² for SPV695-TG12-132BD
Open-circuit voltage
52.05 V
48.07 V
3.98 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.94 V
40.25 V
2.69 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.82 A
18.31 A
4.49 A apart
Current at max power
13.04 A
17.28 A
4.24 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for SPV695-TG12-132BD
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1133x30 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2278x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
2.581 m²
3.103 m²
0.522 m² apart
Weight
26.5 kg
38.0 kg
-11.5 kg for SPV560-PM10-144
Weight per kWp
47.3 kg/kWp
54.7 kg/kWp
-7.4 kg/kWp for SPV560-PM10-144
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.46 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,530
vs
#4,771
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 2,759 places
Power density
#7,429
vs
#4,779
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 2,650 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419
vs
#6,093
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 4,326 places
Weight
#1,639
vs
#9,072
SPV560-PM10-144 leads by 7,433 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,929
vs
#1,358
SPV695-TG12-132BD leads by 4,571 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV555-PM10-144
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV550-PM10-144
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV545-PM10-144
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV540-PM10-144
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
SpolarPV
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 or SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD?
According to our database: SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD has higher module efficiency (22.41% vs 21.69%); SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 and SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD?
SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 has a module efficiency of 21.69%, while SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD is 22.41%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 use vs SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD?
SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 uses PERC cells; SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 and SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD?
SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 has a 30 years power warranty; SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 and SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD bifacial panels?
SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD is bifacial (captures light from both faces); SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.