Skip to main content
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs MSX10-445HN0B 4 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B

Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Solarever
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
450 Wp 22.52 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B
Mission Solar
MSX10-445HN0B
445 Wp 22.80 % N-type
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

MSX10-445HN0B leads on the differences that matter

The largest is product warranty: 10 yrs longer. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 15 differences
How alike are they
4 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

15 of 19 parameters
Parameter SE-182*105-450M-96-BD MSX10-445HN0B Difference
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs 10 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 35.03 V 39.69 V 4.66 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.05 A 14.02 A 2.03 A apart
Module efficiency 22.52 % 22.80 % 0.28 pp more efficient
Weight 23.0 kg 21.3 kg 1.7 kg lighter
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Weight per kWp 51.1 kg/kWp 47.9 kg/kWp 3.2 kg/kWp lighter
Module area 1.998 m² 1.953 m² 0.045 m² apart
Cell count 96 108 12 cells apart
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.45 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power 30.08 V 33.44 V 3.36 V apart
Current at max power 14.97 A 13.31 A 1.66 A apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x35 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
15,098 kWh
MSX10-445HN0B
14,814 kWh
Lifetime gap
284 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario SE-182*105-450M-96-BD MSX10-445HN0B
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 450 W 445 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 430 W 426 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 410 W 406 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 389 W 387 W
03

Full specification

Parameter SE-182*105-450M-96-BD MSX10-445HN0B Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 450 Wp 445 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.52 % 22.80 % +0.28 pp for MSX10-445HN0B
Power density 225.2 Wp/m² 227.9 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 35.03 V 39.69 V 4.66 V apart
Voltage at max power 30.08 V 33.44 V 3.36 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.05 A 14.02 A 2.03 A apart
Current at max power 14.97 A 13.31 A 1.66 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for MSX10-445HN0B
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x35 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x35 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 1.953 m² 0.045 m² apart
Weight 23.0 kg 21.3 kg -1.7 kg for MSX10-445HN0B
Weight per kWp 51.1 kg/kWp 47.9 kg/kWp -3.2 kg/kWp for MSX10-445HN0B
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 25 yrs +10 yrs for MSX10-445HN0B
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.45 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 108 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,108 vs #2,714
MSX10-445HN0B leads by 1,394 places
Power density
#4,225 vs #2,790
MSX10-445HN0B leads by 1,435 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #2,165
MSX10-445HN0B leads by 3,928 places
Weight
#4,436 vs #1,948
MSX10-445HN0B leads by 2,488 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,408 vs #5,891
MSX10-445HN0B leads by 2,517 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-470M-96-BD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-460M-96-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-455M-96-BD
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B vs Mission Solar MSX10-440HN0B
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B vs Mission Solar MSX10-435HN0B
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD or Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B?
According to our database: Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B has higher module efficiency (22.80% vs 22.52%); Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD has a module efficiency of 22.52%, while Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD use vs Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD uses TOPCon cells; Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD has a 30 years power warranty; Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B bifacial panels?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Compare Solarever and Mission Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 1 Solarever offer · See 5 Mission Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.