Skip to main content
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W

Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Solarever
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
450 Wp 22.52 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
HT-SAAE
HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
435 Wp 22.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is product warranty: 15 yrs longer. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter SE-182*105-450M-96-BD HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W Difference
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs longer
Short-circuit current 16.05 A 14.31 A 1.74 A apart
Open-circuit voltage 35.03 V 38.40 V 3.37 V apart
Weight per kWp 51.1 kg/kWp 55.2 kg/kWp 4.1 kg/kWp lighter
Rated power 450 Wp 435 Wp 15 W more power
Module efficiency 22.52 % 22.30 % 0.22 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.310 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Module area 1.998 m² 1.953 m² 0.045 m² apart
Cell count 96 108 12 cells apart
Weight 23.0 kg 24.0 kg 1.0 kg lighter
Current at max power 14.97 A 13.60 A 1.37 A apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power 30.08 V 32.00 V 1.92 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
15,098 kWh
HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
14,595 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario SE-182*105-450M-96-BD HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 450 W 435 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 430 W 415 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 410 W 395 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 389 W 374 W
03

Full specification

Parameter SE-182*105-450M-96-BD HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 450 Wp 435 Wp +15 W for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Module efficiency 22.52 % 22.30 % +0.22 pp for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Power density 225.2 Wp/m² 222.8 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 35.03 V 38.40 V 3.37 V apart
Voltage at max power 30.08 V 32.00 V 1.92 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.05 A 14.31 A 1.74 A apart
Current at max power 14.97 A 13.60 A 1.37 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.310 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 1.953 m² 0.045 m² apart
Weight 23.0 kg 24.0 kg -1.0 kg for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Weight per kWp 51.1 kg/kWp 55.2 kg/kWp -4.1 kg/kWp for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs +15 yrs for HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 108 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#4,167 vs #5,161
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads by 994 places
Power density
#4,284 vs #5,212
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads by 928 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #8,069
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads by 1,917 places
Weight
#4,460 vs #9,671
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads by 5,211 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,472 vs #5,989
HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W leads by 2,483 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-470M-96-BD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-460M-96-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-455M-96-BD
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460W
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 455W
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD or HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W?
According to our database: Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD has higher module efficiency (22.52% vs 22.30%); Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.310%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD has a module efficiency of 22.52%, while HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435 W is 22.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD use vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD uses TOPCon cells; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD has a 30 years power warranty; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W bifacial panels?
Both Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare Solarever and HT-SAAE as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 2 Solarever offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.