Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
VS
The verdict
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is product warranty: 15 yrs longer. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
Difference
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
15 yrs longer
Short-circuit current
16.05 A
14.31 A
1.74 A apart
Open-circuit voltage
35.03 V
38.40 V
3.37 V apart
Weight per kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
55.2 kg/kWp
4.1 kg/kWp lighter
Rated power
450 Wp
435 Wp
15 W more power
Module efficiency
22.52 %
22.30 %
0.22 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.310 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Module area
1.998 m²
1.953 m²
0.045 m² apart
Cell count
96
108
12 cells apart
Weight
23.0 kg
24.0 kg
1.0 kg lighter
Current at max power
14.97 A
13.60 A
1.37 A apart
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power
30.08 V
32.00 V
1.92 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
15,098 kWh
HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
14,595 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
450 W
435 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.3% of rated power
430 W
415 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.7% of rated power
410 W
395 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.0% of rated power
389 W
374 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
450 Wp
435 Wp
+15 W for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Module efficiency
22.52 %
22.30 %
+0.22 pp for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Power density
225.2 Wp/m²
222.8 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
35.03 V
38.40 V
3.37 V apart
Voltage at max power
30.08 V
32.00 V
1.92 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.05 A
14.31 A
1.74 A apart
Current at max power
14.97 A
13.60 A
1.37 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.310 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
1.953 m²
0.045 m² apart
Weight
23.0 kg
24.0 kg
-1.0 kg for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Weight per kWp
51.1 kg/kWp
55.2 kg/kWp
-4.1 kg/kWp for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
+15 yrs for HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
96
108
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,167
vs
#5,161
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads by 994 places
Power density
#4,284
vs
#5,212
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads by 928 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152
vs
#8,069
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads by 1,917 places
Weight
#4,460
vs
#9,671
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads by 5,211 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,472
vs
#5,989
HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W leads by 2,483 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-470M-96-BD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-460M-96-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-455M-96-BD
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460W
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 455W
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD or HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W?
According to our database: Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD has higher module efficiency (22.52% vs 22.30%); Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.310%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD has a module efficiency of 22.52%, while HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435 W is 22.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD use vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD uses TOPCon cells; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W?
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD has a 30 years power warranty; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W bifacial panels?
Both Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 2 Solarever offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

