Skip to main content
HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W vs SE-182*105-450M-96-BD 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W vs Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD

HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
HT-SAAE
HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
435 Wp 22.30 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Solarever
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
450 Wp 22.52 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is product warranty: 15 yrs longer. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W SE-182*105-450M-96-BD Difference
Product warranty 30 yrs 15 yrs 15 yrs longer
Short-circuit current 14.31 A 16.05 A 1.74 A apart
Open-circuit voltage 38.40 V 35.03 V 3.37 V apart
Weight per kWp 55.2 kg/kWp 51.1 kg/kWp 4.1 kg/kWp lighter
Rated power 435 Wp 450 Wp 15 W more power
Module efficiency 22.30 % 22.52 % 0.22 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Module area 1.953 m² 1.998 m² 0.045 m² apart
Cell count 108 96 12 cells apart
Weight 24.0 kg 23.0 kg 1.0 kg lighter
Current at max power 13.60 A 14.97 A 1.37 A apart
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power 32.00 V 30.08 V 1.92 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
14,595 kWh
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
15,098 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 435 W 450 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 415 W 430 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 395 W 410 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 374 W 389 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W SE-182*105-450M-96-BD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 435 Wp 450 Wp +15 W for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Module efficiency 22.30 % 22.52 % +0.22 pp for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Power density 222.8 Wp/m² 225.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 38.40 V 35.03 V 3.37 V apart
Voltage at max power 32.00 V 30.08 V 1.92 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.31 A 16.05 A 1.74 A apart
Current at max power 13.60 A 14.97 A 1.37 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.953 m² 1.998 m² 0.045 m² apart
Weight 24.0 kg 23.0 kg -1.0 kg for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Weight per kWp 55.2 kg/kWp 51.1 kg/kWp -4.1 kg/kWp for SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 15 yrs +15 yrs for HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 96 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#5,161 vs #4,167
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads by 994 places
Power density
#5,212 vs #4,284
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads by 928 places
Heat behaviour
#8,069 vs #6,152
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads by 1,917 places
Weight
#9,671 vs #4,460
SE-182*105-450M-96-BD leads by 5,211 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,989 vs #8,472
HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W leads by 2,483 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460W
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 455W
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W
5 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 445W
4 differences, the largest is module area
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 440W
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 430W
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W or Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD?
According to our database: Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD has higher module efficiency (22.52% vs 22.30%); Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.310%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W and Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435 W has a module efficiency of 22.30%, while Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD is 22.52%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W use vs Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435 W uses TOPCon cells; Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W and Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435 W has a 30 years power warranty; Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W and Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD bifacial panels?
Both HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435 W and Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare HT-SAAE and Solarever as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 2 Solarever offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.