Skip to main content
640 XL vs 580-XM+-BIFACIAL 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Silfab SIL-640 XL vs Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL

Silfab
SIL-640 XL
640 Wp 22.92 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Silfab
SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL
580 Wp 22.40 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

640 XL leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 60 W more power. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter 640 XL 580-XM+-BIFACIAL Difference
Rated power 640 Wp 580 Wp 60 W more power
Module efficiency 22.92 % 22.40 % 0.52 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage 57.76 V 52.27 V 5.49 V apart
Module area 2.793 m² 2.581 m² 0.212 m² apart
Power density 229.2 Wp/m² 224.7 Wp/m² 4.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp 46.1 kg/kWp 49.1 kg/kWp 3.0 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 48.78 V 44.27 V 4.51 V apart
Cell count 156 144 12 cells apart
Weight 29.5 kg 28.5 kg 1.0 kg lighter
Dimensions 2465x1133x35 mm 2278x1133x35 mm 2465x1133x35 mm vs 2278x1133x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
640 XL
21,577 kWh
580-XM+-BIFACIAL
19,554 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,023 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 640 XL 580-XM+-BIFACIAL
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 640 W 580 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 612 W 555 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 584 W 530 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 556 W 504 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 640 XL 580-XM+-BIFACIAL Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 640 Wp 580 Wp +60 W for 640 XL
Module efficiency 22.92 % 22.40 % +0.52 pp for 640 XL
Power density 229.2 Wp/m² 224.7 Wp/m² +4.4 Wp/m² for 640 XL
Open-circuit voltage 57.76 V 52.27 V 5.49 V apart
Voltage at max power 48.78 V 44.27 V 4.51 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.76 A 13.85 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.12 A 13.10 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1133x35 mm 2278x1133x35 mm 2465x1133x35 mm vs 2278x1133x35 mm
Module area 2.793 m² 2.581 m² 0.212 m² apart
Weight 29.5 kg 28.5 kg -1.0 kg for 580-XM+-BIFACIAL
Weight per kWp 46.1 kg/kWp 49.1 kg/kWp -3.0 kg/kWp for 640 XL
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.30 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,350 vs #4,774
640 XL leads by 2,424 places
Power density
#2,379 vs #4,528
640 XL leads by 2,149 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,004 vs #2,767
640 XL leads by 1,763 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#650 vs #2,018
640 XL leads by 1,368 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-640 XL vs Silfab SIL-630 XL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-640 XL vs Silfab SIL-620 XL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-590 XM+
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-570 XM+
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-530 XM
7 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Silfab SIL-640 XL or Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL?
According to our database: Silfab SIL-640 XL has higher module efficiency (22.92% vs 22.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Silfab SIL-640 XL and Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL?
Silfab SIL-640 XL has a module efficiency of 22.92%, while Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL is 22.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Silfab SIL-640 XL use vs Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL?
Silfab SIL-640 XL uses N-type cells; Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Silfab SIL-640 XL and Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL?
Silfab SIL-640 XL has a 30 years power warranty; Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Silfab SIL-640 XL and Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL bifacial panels?
Both Silfab SIL-640 XL and Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 2 Silfab offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.