Skip to main content
580-XM+-BIFACIAL vs 570 XM+ BIFACIAL 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL

Silfab
SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL
580 Wp 22.40 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Silfab
SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL
570 Wp 22.10 % N-type Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

580-XM+-BIFACIAL leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter 580-XM+-BIFACIAL 570 XM+ BIFACIAL Difference
Module efficiency 22.40 % 22.10 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Power density 224.7 Wp/m² 220.8 Wp/m² 3.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 580 Wp 570 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
580-XM+-BIFACIAL
19,251 kWh
570 XM+ BIFACIAL
18,919 kWh
Lifetime gap
332 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 580-XM+-BIFACIAL 570 XM+ BIFACIAL
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 580 W 570 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 555 W 545 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 530 W 520 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 504 W 496 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 580-XM+-BIFACIAL 570 XM+ BIFACIAL Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 580 Wp 570 Wp +10 W for 580-XM+-BIFACIAL
Module efficiency 22.40 % 22.10 % +0.30 pp for 580-XM+-BIFACIAL
Power density 224.7 Wp/m² 220.8 Wp/m² +3.9 Wp/m² for 580-XM+-BIFACIAL
Open-circuit voltage 52.27 V 52.03 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 44.27 V 43.74 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.85 A 13.79 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.10 A 13.03 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1133x35 mm 2278x1133x35 mm Same
Module area 2.581 m² 2.581 m² Same
Weight 28.5 kg 28.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 49.1 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr - Not published by Silfab
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,774 vs #6,012
580-XM+-BIFACIAL leads by 1,238 places
Power density
#4,528 vs #6,015
580-XM+-BIFACIAL leads by 1,487 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,767 vs #3,575
580-XM+-BIFACIAL leads by 808 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,018 vs #2,566
580-XM+-BIFACIAL leads by 548 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-590 XM+
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-570 XM+
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-530 XM
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-520 XM
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-520 QM
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-640 XL
10 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL or Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL?
According to our database: Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL has higher module efficiency (22.40% vs 22.10%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL and Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL?
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL has a module efficiency of 22.40%, while Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL is 22.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL use vs Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL?
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL uses N-type cells; Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL and Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL?
Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL has a 30 years power warranty; Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL and Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL bifacial panels?
Both Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL and Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 2 Silfab offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.