Skip to main content
430-QD vs 420 QD 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-420 QD

Silfab SIL-430-QD
Silfab
SIL-430-QD
430 Wp 22.10 % N-type
VS
Silfab SIL-420 QD
Silfab
SIL-420 QD
420 Wp 21.50 % N-type
The verdict

430-QD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.60 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter 430-QD 420 QD Difference
Module efficiency 22.10 % 21.50 % 0.60 pp more efficient
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.10 %/yr slower
Power density 220.5 Wp/m² 215.4 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 430 Wp 420 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
430-QD
14,497 kWh
420 QD
13,941 kWh
Lifetime gap
556 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 430-QD 420 QD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 430 W 420 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 411 W 402 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 393 W 383 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 374 W 365 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 430-QD 420 QD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 430 Wp 420 Wp +10 W for 430-QD
Module efficiency 22.10 % 21.50 % +0.60 pp for 430-QD
Power density 220.5 Wp/m² 215.4 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for 430-QD
Open-circuit voltage 38.91 V 38.84 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.25 V 33.08 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.87 A 13.50 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.93 A 12.70 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1721x1133x35 mm 1721x1133x35 mm Same
Module area 1.950 m² 1.950 m² Same
Weight 21.0 kg 21.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 48.8 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.10 %/yr for 430-QD
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#6,012 vs #7,958
430-QD leads by 1,946 places
Power density
#6,191 vs #7,783
430-QD leads by 1,592 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,492 vs #3,317
430-QD leads by 825 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,342 vs #8,547
430-QD leads by 1,205 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-440 QD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-430 QD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-370 NT mono PERC
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-640 XL
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-630 XL
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-620 XL
8 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Silfab SIL-430-QD or Silfab SIL-420 QD?
According to our database: Silfab SIL-430-QD has higher module efficiency (22.10% vs 21.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Silfab SIL-430-QD and Silfab SIL-420 QD?
Silfab SIL-430-QD has a module efficiency of 22.10%, while Silfab SIL-420 QD is 21.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Silfab SIL-430-QD use vs Silfab SIL-420 QD?
Silfab SIL-430-QD uses N-type cells; Silfab SIL-420 QD uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Silfab SIL-430-QD and Silfab SIL-420 QD?
Silfab SIL-430-QD has a 30 years power warranty; Silfab SIL-420 QD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 2 Silfab offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.