Skip to main content
420 QD vs 430-QD 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-430-QD

Silfab SIL-420 QD
Silfab
SIL-420 QD
420 Wp 21.50 % N-type
VS
Silfab SIL-430-QD
Silfab
SIL-430-QD
430 Wp 22.10 % N-type
The verdict

430-QD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.60 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter 420 QD 430-QD Difference
Module efficiency 21.50 % 22.10 % 0.60 pp more efficient
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.30 %/yr 0.10 %/yr slower
Power density 215.4 Wp/m² 220.5 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 420 Wp 430 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
420 QD
13,941 kWh
430-QD
14,497 kWh
Lifetime gap
556 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 420 QD 430-QD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 420 W 430 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 402 W 411 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 383 W 393 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 365 W 374 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 420 QD 430-QD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 420 Wp 430 Wp +10 W for 430-QD
Module efficiency 21.50 % 22.10 % +0.60 pp for 430-QD
Power density 215.4 Wp/m² 220.5 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for 430-QD
Open-circuit voltage 38.84 V 38.91 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.08 V 33.25 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.50 A 13.87 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.70 A 12.93 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1721x1133x35 mm 1721x1133x35 mm Same
Module area 1.950 m² 1.950 m² Same
Weight 21.0 kg 21.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 48.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.30 %/yr -0.10 %/yr for 430-QD
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,958 vs #6,012
430-QD leads by 1,946 places
Power density
#7,783 vs #6,191
430-QD leads by 1,592 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,317 vs #2,492
430-QD leads by 825 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,547 vs #7,342
430-QD leads by 1,205 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-440 QD
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-430 QD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-370 NT mono PERC
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-640 XL
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-630 XL
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-620 XL
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Silfab SIL-420 QD or Silfab SIL-430-QD?
According to our database: Silfab SIL-430-QD has higher module efficiency (22.10% vs 21.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Silfab SIL-420 QD and Silfab SIL-430-QD?
Silfab SIL-420 QD has a module efficiency of 21.50%, while Silfab SIL-430-QD is 22.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Silfab SIL-420 QD use vs Silfab SIL-430-QD?
Silfab SIL-420 QD uses N-type cells; Silfab SIL-430-QD uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Silfab SIL-420 QD and Silfab SIL-430-QD?
Silfab SIL-420 QD has a 30 years power warranty; Silfab SIL-430-QD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 2 Silfab offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.