Skip to main content
420 QD vs 430 QD 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-430 QD

Silfab SIL-420 QD
Silfab
SIL-420 QD
420 Wp 21.50 % N-type
VS
Silfab SIL-430 QD
Silfab
SIL-430 QD
430 Wp 22.10 % N-type
The verdict

430 QD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.60 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter 420 QD 430 QD Difference
Module efficiency 21.50 % 22.10 % 0.60 pp more efficient
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.30 %/yr 0.10 %/yr slower
Power density 215.4 Wp/m² 220.5 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 420 Wp 430 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
420 QD
13,941 kWh
430 QD
14,497 kWh
Lifetime gap
556 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 420 QD 430 QD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 420 W 430 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 402 W 411 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 383 W 393 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 365 W 374 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 420 QD 430 QD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 420 Wp 430 Wp +10 W for 430 QD
Module efficiency 21.50 % 22.10 % +0.60 pp for 430 QD
Power density 215.4 Wp/m² 220.5 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for 430 QD
Open-circuit voltage 38.84 V 38.91 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.08 V 33.25 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.50 A 13.87 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.70 A 12.93 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1721x1133x35 mm 1721x1133x35 mm Same
Module area 1.950 m² 1.950 m² Same
Weight 21.0 kg 21.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 48.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.30 %/yr -0.10 %/yr for 430 QD
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,958 vs #6,012
430 QD leads by 1,946 places
Power density
#7,783 vs #6,191
430 QD leads by 1,592 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,317 vs #2,492
430 QD leads by 825 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,547 vs #7,342
430 QD leads by 1,205 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-440 QD
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-430-QD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-370 NT mono PERC
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-640 XL
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-630 XL
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-420 QD vs Silfab SIL-620 XL
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Silfab SIL-420 QD or Silfab SIL-430 QD?
According to our database: Silfab SIL-430 QD has higher module efficiency (22.10% vs 21.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Silfab SIL-420 QD and Silfab SIL-430 QD?
Silfab SIL-420 QD has a module efficiency of 21.50%, while Silfab SIL-430 QD is 22.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Silfab SIL-420 QD use vs Silfab SIL-430 QD?
Silfab SIL-420 QD uses N-type cells; Silfab SIL-430 QD uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Silfab SIL-420 QD and Silfab SIL-430 QD?
Silfab SIL-420 QD has a 30 years power warranty; Silfab SIL-430 QD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 2 Silfab offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.