Skip to main content
430-QD vs 430 QD 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-430 QD

Silfab SIL-430-QD
Silfab
SIL-430-QD
430 Wp 22.10 % N-type
VS
Silfab SIL-430 QD
Silfab
SIL-430 QD
430 Wp 22.10 % N-type
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
430-QD
14,497 kWh
430 QD
14,497 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 430-QD 430 QD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 430 W 430 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 411 W 411 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 393 W 393 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 374 W 374 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 430-QD 430 QD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 430 Wp 430 Wp Same
Module efficiency 22.10 % 22.10 % Same
Power density 220.5 Wp/m² 220.5 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 38.91 V 38.91 V Same
Voltage at max power 33.25 V 33.25 V Same
Short-circuit current 13.87 A 13.87 A Same
Current at max power 12.93 A 12.93 A Same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1721x1133x35 mm 1721x1133x35 mm Same
Module area 1.950 m² 1.950 m² Same
Weight 21.0 kg 21.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 48.8 kg/kWp 48.8 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.30 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#6,012 vs #6,012
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#6,191 vs #6,191
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,492 vs #2,492
Tied - the same position in the database
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,342 vs #7,342
Tied - the same position in the database
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-440 QD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-420 QD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-370 NT mono PERC
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-640 XL
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-630 XL
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-430-QD vs Silfab SIL-620 XL
8 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Silfab SIL-430-QD or Silfab SIL-430 QD?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Silfab SIL-430-QD and Silfab SIL-430 QD?
Silfab SIL-430-QD has a module efficiency of 22.10%, while Silfab SIL-430 QD is 22.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Silfab SIL-430-QD use vs Silfab SIL-430 QD?
Silfab SIL-430-QD uses N-type cells; Silfab SIL-430 QD uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Silfab SIL-430-QD and Silfab SIL-430 QD?
Silfab SIL-430-QD has a 30 years power warranty; Silfab SIL-430 QD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 2 Silfab offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.