Skip to main content
S695M66NT4BF vs S700M66NT4BF 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF

Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF
Shinson Technology
S695M66NT4BF
695 Wp 22.37 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF
Shinson Technology
S700M66NT4BF
700 Wp 22.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.310 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
S695M66NT4BF
23,319 kWh
S700M66NT4BF
23,486 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario S695M66NT4BF S700M66NT4BF
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 695 W 700 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 663 W 667 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 630 W 635 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 598 W 602 W
03

Full specification

Parameter S695M66NT4BF S700M66NT4BF Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 695 Wp 700 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.37 % 22.53 % Effectively the same
Power density 223.7 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 47.07 V 47.26 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 39.13 V 39.33 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.84 A 18.89 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.76 A 17.80 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.310 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.0 kg 38.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.7 kg/kWp 54.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,970 vs #3,982
S700M66NT4BF leads by 988 places
Power density
#4,877 vs #3,989
S700M66NT4BF leads by 888 places
Heat behaviour
#8,005 vs #8,005
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,072 vs #8,524
S700M66NT4BF leads by 548 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#146 vs #114
S700M66NT4BF leads by 32 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S705M66HT4BF
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S690M66NT4BF
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF or Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF?
According to our database: Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF has higher module efficiency (22.53% vs 22.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF and Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF?
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF has a module efficiency of 22.37%, while Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF is 22.53%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF use vs Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF?
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF uses TOPCon cells; Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF and Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF?
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF has a 30 years power warranty; Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF and Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF bifacial panels?
Both Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF and Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.