Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF
VS
The verdict
S720M66HT4BF leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.81 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
S695M66NT4BF
S720M66HT4BF
Difference
Module efficiency
22.37 %
23.18 %
0.81 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.310 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Power density
223.7 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
8.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
695 Wp
720 Wp
25 W more power
Open-circuit voltage
47.07 V
50.74 V
3.67 V apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Short-circuit current
18.84 A
17.67 A
1.17 A apart
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power
39.13 V
42.68 V
3.55 V apart
Current at max power
17.76 A
16.87 A
0.89 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
S695M66NT4BF
23,319 kWh
S720M66HT4BF
24,345 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,026 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
S695M66NT4BF
S720M66HT4BF
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
695 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.3% of rated power
663 W
692 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.7% of rated power
630 W
664 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.0% of rated power
598 W
636 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
S695M66NT4BF
S720M66HT4BF
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
695 Wp
720 Wp
+25 W for S720M66HT4BF
Module efficiency
22.37 %
23.18 %
+0.81 pp for S720M66HT4BF
Power density
223.7 Wp/m²
231.8 Wp/m²
+8.0 Wp/m² for S720M66HT4BF
Open-circuit voltage
47.07 V
50.74 V
3.67 V apart
Voltage at max power
39.13 V
42.68 V
3.55 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.84 A
17.67 A
1.17 A apart
Current at max power
17.76 A
16.87 A
0.89 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.310 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for S720M66HT4BF
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.0 kg
38.7 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
54.7 kg/kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for S720M66HT4BF
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,970
vs
#1,424
S720M66HT4BF leads by 3,546 places
Power density
#4,877
vs
#1,347
S720M66HT4BF leads by 3,530 places
Heat behaviour
#8,005
vs
#511
S720M66HT4BF leads by 7,494 places
Weight
#9,072
vs
#7,805
S720M66HT4BF leads by 1,267 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#146
vs
#25
S720M66HT4BF leads by 121 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S705M66HT4BF
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S690M66NT4BF
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF or Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF?
According to our database: Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF has higher module efficiency (23.18% vs 22.37%); Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.310%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF and Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF?
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF has a module efficiency of 22.37%, while Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF is 23.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF use vs Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF?
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF uses TOPCon cells; Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF and Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF?
Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF has a 30 years power warranty; Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF and Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF bifacial panels?
Both Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF and Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.