Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG
VS
The verdict
SRP-730-BHC-BG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.042 %/°C better in heat. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SEG-495-BTB-BG
SRP-730-BHC-BG
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.258 %/°C
0.042 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
495 Wp
730 Wp
235 W more power
Module efficiency
22.87 %
23.50 %
0.63 pp more efficient
Weight
27.3 kg
38.5 kg
11.2 kg lighter
Power density
228.7 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
6.3 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
43.80 V
51.12 V
7.32 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.20 A
17.80 A
3.60 A apart
Module area
2.165 m²
3.106 m²
0.942 m² apart
Cell technology
N-type
HJT
N-type vs HJT
Voltage at max power
36.60 V
43.10 V
6.50 V apart
Current at max power
13.52 A
17.00 A
3.48 A apart
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Weight per kWp
55.2 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
2.4 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions
1909x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1909x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SEG-495-BTB-BG
16,643 kWh
SRP-730-BHC-BG
24,874 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,231 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
SEG-495-BTB-BG
SRP-730-BHC-BG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
495 W
730 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
473 W
702 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
450 W
673 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
428 W
645 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
SEG-495-BTB-BG
SRP-730-BHC-BG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
495 Wp
730 Wp
+235 W for SRP-730-BHC-BG
Module efficiency
22.87 %
23.50 %
+0.63 pp for SRP-730-BHC-BG
Power density
228.7 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
+6.3 Wp/m² for SRP-730-BHC-BG
Open-circuit voltage
43.80 V
51.12 V
7.32 V apart
Voltage at max power
36.60 V
43.10 V
6.50 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.20 A
17.80 A
3.60 A apart
Current at max power
13.52 A
17.00 A
3.48 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.258 %/°C
+0.042 %/°C for SRP-730-BHC-BG
Mechanical
Dimensions
1909x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1909x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.165 m²
3.106 m²
0.942 m² apart
Weight
27.3 kg
38.5 kg
-11.2 kg for SEG-495-BTB-BG
Weight per kWp
55.2 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
-2.4 kg/kWp for SRP-730-BHC-BG
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.34 %/yr
0.30 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
HJT
N-type vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#2,531
vs
#716
SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 1,815 places
Power density
#2,456
vs
#800
SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 1,656 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#466
SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 5,627 places
Weight
#9,577
vs
#6,396
SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 3,181 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,379
vs
#208
SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 6,171 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-485-BTB-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-480-BTB-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-475-BTB-BG
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-470-BTB-BG
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG or Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG?
According to our database: Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.87%); Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.258%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG and Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG?
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG has a module efficiency of 22.87%, while Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG use vs Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG?
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG uses N-type cells; Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG and Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG?
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG has a 30 years power warranty; Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG and Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG bifacial panels?
Both Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG and Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 Seraphim offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.