Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG vs Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG
VS
The verdict
SRP-730-BHC-BG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.042 %/°C better in heat. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SRP-730-BHC-BG
SEG-495-BTB-BG
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.258 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.042 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
730 Wp
495 Wp
235 W more power
Module efficiency
23.50 %
22.87 %
0.63 pp more efficient
Weight
38.5 kg
27.3 kg
11.2 kg lighter
Power density
235.0 Wp/m²
228.7 Wp/m²
6.3 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage
51.12 V
43.80 V
7.32 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.80 A
14.20 A
3.60 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.165 m²
0.942 m² apart
Cell technology
HJT
N-type
HJT vs N-type
Voltage at max power
43.10 V
36.60 V
6.50 V apart
Current at max power
17.00 A
13.52 A
3.48 A apart
Cell count
132
120
12 cells apart
Weight per kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
55.2 kg/kWp
2.4 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1909x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1909x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SRP-730-BHC-BG
24,874 kWh
SEG-495-BTB-BG
16,643 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,231 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
SRP-730-BHC-BG
SEG-495-BTB-BG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
730 W
495 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
702 W
473 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
673 W
450 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
645 W
428 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
SRP-730-BHC-BG
SEG-495-BTB-BG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
730 Wp
495 Wp
+235 W for SRP-730-BHC-BG
Module efficiency
23.50 %
22.87 %
+0.63 pp for SRP-730-BHC-BG
Power density
235.0 Wp/m²
228.7 Wp/m²
+6.3 Wp/m² for SRP-730-BHC-BG
Open-circuit voltage
51.12 V
43.80 V
7.32 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.10 V
36.60 V
6.50 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.80 A
14.20 A
3.60 A apart
Current at max power
17.00 A
13.52 A
3.48 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.258 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.042 %/°C for SRP-730-BHC-BG
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1909x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1909x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.165 m²
0.942 m² apart
Weight
38.5 kg
27.3 kg
-11.2 kg for SEG-495-BTB-BG
Weight per kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
55.2 kg/kWp
-2.4 kg/kWp for SRP-730-BHC-BG
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.30 %/yr
0.34 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
N-type
HJT vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
120
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#716
vs
#2,531
SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 1,815 places
Power density
#800
vs
#2,456
SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 1,656 places
Heat behaviour
#466
vs
#6,093
SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 5,627 places
Weight
#6,396
vs
#9,577
SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 3,181 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#208
vs
#6,379
SRP-730-BHC-BG leads by 6,171 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-725-BHC-BG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-720-BHC-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-715-BHC-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-710-BHC-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG vs Seraphim SRP-705-BHC-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG or Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG?
According to our database: Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.87%); Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.258%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG and Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG?
Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG is 22.87%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG use vs Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG?
Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG uses HJT cells; Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG and Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG?
Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG has a 30 years power warranty; Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG and Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG bifacial panels?
Both Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG and Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 Seraphim offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.