Skip to main content
495-BTB-BG vs 465-BTB-BG 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG

SEG-495-BTB-BG
495 Wp 22.87 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
SEG-465-BTB-BG
465 Wp 21.48 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

495-BTB-BG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.39 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter 495-BTB-BG 465-BTB-BG Difference
Module efficiency 22.87 % 21.48 % 1.39 pp more efficient
Power density 228.7 Wp/m² 214.8 Wp/m² 13.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 495 Wp 465 Wp 30 W more power
Weight per kWp 55.2 kg/kWp 58.7 kg/kWp 3.6 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Annual degradation 0.34 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.06 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage 43.80 V 42.60 V 1.20 V apart
Voltage at max power 36.60 V 35.40 V 1.20 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
495-BTB-BG
16,643 kWh
465-BTB-BG
15,334 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,309 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 495-BTB-BG 465-BTB-BG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 495 W 465 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 473 W 444 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 450 W 423 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 428 W 402 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 495-BTB-BG 465-BTB-BG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 495 Wp 465 Wp +30 W for 495-BTB-BG
Module efficiency 22.87 % 21.48 % +1.39 pp for 495-BTB-BG
Power density 228.7 Wp/m² 214.8 Wp/m² +13.9 Wp/m² for 495-BTB-BG
Open-circuit voltage 43.80 V 42.60 V 1.20 V apart
Voltage at max power 36.60 V 35.40 V 1.20 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.20 A 13.82 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.52 A 13.14 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1909x1134x30 mm 1909x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.165 m² 2.165 m² Same
Weight 27.3 kg 27.3 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.2 kg/kWp 58.7 kg/kWp -3.6 kg/kWp for 495-BTB-BG
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.34 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.06 %/yr for 495-BTB-BG
Technology
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 120 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,531 vs #8,152
495-BTB-BG leads by 5,621 places
Power density
#2,456 vs #8,116
495-BTB-BG leads by 5,660 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,577 vs #11,841
495-BTB-BG leads by 2,264 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,379 vs #9,185
495-BTB-BG leads by 2,806 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-490-BTB-BG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-485-BTB-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-480-BTB-BG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-475-BTB-BG
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SEG-470-BTB-BG
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG vs Seraphim SRP-730-BHC-BG
14 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG or Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG?
According to our database: Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG has higher module efficiency (22.87% vs 21.48%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG and Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG?
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG has a module efficiency of 22.87%, while Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG is 21.48%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG use vs Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG?
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG uses N-type cells; Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG and Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG?
Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG has a 30 years power warranty; Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG and Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG bifacial panels?
Both Seraphim SEG-495-BTB-BG and Seraphim SEG-465-BTB-BG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Seraphim offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.