Skip to main content
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW

Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
725 Wp 23.34 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW
PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW
730 Wp 23.50 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
24,420 kWh
PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW
24,588 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 699 W 704 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 673 W 677 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 647 W 651 W
03

Full specification

Parameter PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 730 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.34 % 23.50 % Effectively the same
Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 50.31 V 50.42 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.25 V 42.35 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.24 A 18.33 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.16 A 17.24 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.9 kg 37.9 kg Same
Weight per kWp 52.3 kg/kWp 51.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.38 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#981 vs #749
PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 232 places
Power density
#974 vs #836
PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 138 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,799 vs #5,370
PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 429 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#255 vs #199
PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 56 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar NS-720MH-132
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW or Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW?
According to our database: Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.34%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW use vs Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW uses HJT cells; Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW bifacial panels?
Both Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Phono Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.