Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW
VS
The verdict
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.48 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
16
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
3 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW
Difference
Module efficiency
23.34 %
22.86 %
0.48 pp more efficient
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
228.6 Wp/m²
4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
725 Wp
710 Wp
15 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
24,420 kWh
PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW
23,915 kWh
Lifetime gap
505 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
710 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.4% of rated power
699 W
684 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.8% of rated power
673 W
659 W
Hot roof
70 °C
89.2% of rated power
647 W
633 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
710 Wp
+15 W for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Module efficiency
23.34 %
22.86 %
+0.48 pp for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
228.6 Wp/m²
+4.8 Wp/m² for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Open-circuit voltage
50.31 V
50.01 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
42.25 V
41.99 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.24 A
17.97 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.16 A
16.91 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
37.9 kg
37.9 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
52.3 kg/kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.38 %/yr
0.38 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
HJT
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#981
vs
#2,591
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 1,610 places
Power density
#974
vs
#2,529
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 1,555 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,799
vs
#7,339
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 1,540 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#255
vs
#618
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 363 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar NS-720MH-132
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same manufacturer
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW or Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW?
According to our database: Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 22.86%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW is 22.86%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW use vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW uses HJT cells; Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW bifacial panels?
Both Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 4 Phono Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.