Skip to main content
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs NS-730MH-132 11 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132

Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
725 Wp 23.34 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
NS-730MH-132
730 Wp 23.50 % N-type Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 11 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
11 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

7 of 18 parameters
Parameter PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW NS-730MH-132 Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Weight 37.9 kg 34.0 kg 3.9 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 52.3 kg/kWp 46.6 kg/kWp 5.7 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology HJT N-type HJT vs N-type
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
24,325 kWh
NS-730MH-132
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW NS-730MH-132
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 725 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 699 W 698 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 673 W 666 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 647 W 635 W
03

Full specification

Parameter PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW NS-730MH-132 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 725 Wp 730 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.34 % 23.50 % Effectively the same
Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 50.31 V 50.16 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.25 V 42.19 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.24 A 18.19 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.16 A 17.31 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 37.9 kg 34.0 kg -3.9 kg for NS-730MH-132
Weight per kWp 52.3 kg/kWp 46.6 kg/kWp -5.7 kg/kWp for NS-730MH-132
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr - Not published by Phono Solar
Technology
Cell technology HJT N-type HJT vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#981 vs #749
NS-730MH-132 leads by 232 places
Power density
#974 vs #836
NS-730MH-132 leads by 138 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #2,220
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 2,207 places
Weight
#5,799 vs #1,233
NS-730MH-132 leads by 4,566 places
Warranty
#21 vs #9,912
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#255 vs #397
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 142 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-720MH-132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 vs Phono Solar NS-710MH-132
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW or Phono Solar NS-730MH-132?
According to our database: Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.34%); Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar NS-730MH-132?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW use vs Phono Solar NS-730MH-132?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW uses HJT cells; Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar NS-730MH-132?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 bifacial panels?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Phono Solar NS-730MH-132 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Phono Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.