Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV
VS
The verdict
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
16
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
3 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class)
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV
Difference
Module efficiency
23.27 %
23.77 %
0.50 pp more efficient
Power density
232.7 Wp/m²
237.7 Wp/m²
5.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
465 Wp
475 Wp
10 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class)
15,602 kWh
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV
15,937 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class)
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
465 W
475 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
445 W
454 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
425 W
434 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
404 W
413 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class)
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
465 Wp
475 Wp
+10 W for JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV
Module efficiency
23.27 %
23.77 %
+0.50 pp for JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV
Power density
232.7 Wp/m²
237.7 Wp/m²
+5.0 Wp/m² for JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV
Open-circuit voltage
36.55 V
36.89 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
30.94 V
31.40 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
15.96 A
16.06 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
15.03 A
15.13 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.998 m²
1.998 m²
Same
Weight
24.0 kg
24.0 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
51.6 kg/kWp
50.5 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
96
96
Same
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,202
vs
#499
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV leads by 703 places
Power density
#1,115
vs
#467
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV leads by 648 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,981
vs
#3,892
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV leads by 1,089 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,892
vs
#5,895
JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV leads by 997 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (475W class)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (470W class)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (460W class)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (455W class)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (450W class)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
13 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class) or Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV has higher module efficiency (23.77% vs 23.27%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class) and Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV?
Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465 W class) has a module efficiency of 23.27%, while Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV is 23.77%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class) use vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV?
Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465 W class) uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465W class) and Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV?
Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV (465 W class) has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DV has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 162 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.