Skip to main content
NT12/66GDF-735 vs M10/72GDF-B-540 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 vs GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540

GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735
GCL-NT12/66GDF-735
735 Wp 23.66 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540
540 Wp 20.60 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

NT12/66GDF-735 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 3.06 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter NT12/66GDF-735 M10/72GDF-B-540 Difference
Module efficiency 23.66 % 20.60 % 3.06 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.350 %/°C 0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 735 Wp 540 Wp 195 W more power
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 205.8 Wp/m² 30.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight 38.2 kg 33.2 kg 5.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 52.0 kg/kWp 61.5 kg/kWp 9.5 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 18.68 A 13.78 A 4.90 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.624 m² 0.482 m² apart
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Current at max power 17.75 A 13.03 A 4.72 A apart
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.45 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2290x1146x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2290x1146x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
NT12/66GDF-735
24,661 kWh
M10/72GDF-B-540
17,783 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,878 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario NT12/66GDF-735 M10/72GDF-B-540
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 735 W 540 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 703 W 512 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 671 W 483 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 639 W 455 W
03

Full specification

Parameter NT12/66GDF-735 M10/72GDF-B-540 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 735 Wp 540 Wp +195 W for NT12/66GDF-735
Module efficiency 23.66 % 20.60 % +3.06 pp for NT12/66GDF-735
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 205.8 Wp/m² +30.8 Wp/m² for NT12/66GDF-735
Open-circuit voltage 49.24 V 49.24 V Same
Voltage at max power 41.41 V 41.45 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.68 A 13.78 A 4.90 A apart
Current at max power 17.75 A 13.03 A 4.72 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.350 %/°C +0.060 %/°C for NT12/66GDF-735
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2290x1146x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2290x1146x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.624 m² 0.482 m² apart
Weight 38.2 kg 33.2 kg -5.0 kg for M10/72GDF-B-540
Weight per kWp 52.0 kg/kWp 61.5 kg/kWp -9.5 kg/kWp for NT12/66GDF-735
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.45 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for NT12/66GDF-735
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#602 vs #11,093
NT12/66GDF-735 leads by 10,491 places
Power density
#582 vs #11,142
NT12/66GDF-735 leads by 10,560 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #10,419
NT12/66GDF-735 leads by 8,254 places
Weight
#5,413 vs #12,653
NT12/66GDF-735 leads by 7,240 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#244 vs #8,312
NT12/66GDF-735 leads by 8,068 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-730
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 vs GCL NT12/66GDF-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF 725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 or GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540?
According to our database: GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 20.60%); GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 and GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 has a module efficiency of 23.66%, while GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 is 20.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 use vs GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 uses TOPCon cells; GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 and GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540?
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 has a 30 years power warranty; GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 and GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 bifacial panels?
Both GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 and GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 6 GCL offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.