Skip to main content
M10/72GDF-B-540 vs NT12/66GDF-735 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735

GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540
540 Wp 20.60 % PERC Bifacial
VS
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735
GCL-NT12/66GDF-735
735 Wp 23.66 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

NT12/66GDF-735 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 3.06 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter M10/72GDF-B-540 NT12/66GDF-735 Difference
Module efficiency 20.60 % 23.66 % 3.06 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 540 Wp 735 Wp 195 W more power
Power density 205.8 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² 30.8 Wp/m² higher
Weight 33.2 kg 38.2 kg 5.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 61.5 kg/kWp 52.0 kg/kWp 9.5 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 13.78 A 18.68 A 4.90 A apart
Module area 2.624 m² 3.106 m² 0.482 m² apart
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Current at max power 13.03 A 17.75 A 4.72 A apart
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Dimensions 2290x1146x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2290x1146x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
M10/72GDF-B-540
17,783 kWh
NT12/66GDF-735
24,661 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,878 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario M10/72GDF-B-540 NT12/66GDF-735
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 540 W 735 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 512 W 703 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 483 W 671 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 455 W 639 W
03

Full specification

Parameter M10/72GDF-B-540 NT12/66GDF-735 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 540 Wp 735 Wp +195 W for NT12/66GDF-735
Module efficiency 20.60 % 23.66 % +3.06 pp for NT12/66GDF-735
Power density 205.8 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² +30.8 Wp/m² for NT12/66GDF-735
Open-circuit voltage 49.24 V 49.24 V Same
Voltage at max power 41.45 V 41.41 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.78 A 18.68 A 4.90 A apart
Current at max power 13.03 A 17.75 A 4.72 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.060 %/°C for NT12/66GDF-735
Mechanical
Dimensions 2290x1146x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2290x1146x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.624 m² 3.106 m² 0.482 m² apart
Weight 33.2 kg 38.2 kg -5.0 kg for M10/72GDF-B-540
Weight per kWp 61.5 kg/kWp 52.0 kg/kWp -9.5 kg/kWp for NT12/66GDF-735
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for NT12/66GDF-735
Technology
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#11,093 vs #602
NT12/66GDF-735 leads by 10,491 places
Power density
#11,142 vs #582
NT12/66GDF-735 leads by 10,560 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #2,165
NT12/66GDF-735 leads by 8,254 places
Weight
#12,653 vs #5,413
NT12/66GDF-735 leads by 7,240 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,312 vs #244
NT12/66GDF-735 leads by 8,068 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 vs GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-555
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 vs GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-550
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 vs GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-545
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 vs GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-535
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-740
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-730
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 or GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735?
According to our database: GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 20.60%); GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 and GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735?
GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 has a module efficiency of 20.60%, while GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 is 23.66%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 use vs GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735?
GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 uses PERC cells; GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 and GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735?
GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 has a 30 years power warranty; GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 and GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 bifacial panels?
Both GCL GCL-M10/72GDF-B-540 and GCL GCL-NT12/66GDF-735 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 6 GCL offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.