Skip to main content
DH96NE.A-465 vs DH132NC-710 6 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710

DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465
DAS Solar
DAS-DH96NE.A-465
465 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
DAS Solar
DAS-DH132NC-710
710 Wp 22.90 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

DH96NE.A-465 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 245 W more power. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
6 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

12 of 18 parameters
Parameter DH96NE.A-465 DH132NC-710 Difference
Rated power 465 Wp 710 Wp 245 W more power
Weight 21.6 kg 38.3 kg 16.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 46.5 kg/kWp 53.9 kg/kWp 7.5 kg/kWp lighter
Module efficiency 23.30 % 22.90 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage 35.78 V 48.92 V 13.14 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.32 A 18.42 A 2.10 A apart
Module area 1.998 m² 3.106 m² 1.108 m² apart
Power density 232.7 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² 4.2 Wp/m² higher
Voltage at max power 30.50 V 40.81 V 10.31 V apart
Current at max power 15.25 A 17.40 A 2.15 A apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DH96NE.A-465
15,602 kWh
DH132NC-710
23,822 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,220 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH96NE.A-465 DH132NC-710
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 465 W 710 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 445 W 680 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 426 W 650 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 406 W 621 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH96NE.A-465 DH132NC-710 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 465 Wp 710 Wp +245 W for DH132NC-710
Module efficiency 23.30 % 22.90 % +0.40 pp for DH96NE.A-465
Power density 232.7 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² +4.2 Wp/m² for DH96NE.A-465
Open-circuit voltage 35.78 V 48.92 V 13.14 V apart
Voltage at max power 30.50 V 40.81 V 10.31 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.32 A 18.42 A 2.10 A apart
Current at max power 15.25 A 17.40 A 2.15 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 3.106 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight 21.6 kg 38.3 kg -16.7 kg for DH96NE.A-465
Weight per kWp 46.5 kg/kWp 53.9 kg/kWp -7.5 kg/kWp for DH96NE.A-465
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count - 132 Not published by DAS Solar
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,017 vs #2,359
DH96NE.A-465 leads by 1,342 places
Power density
#1,115 vs #2,474
DH96NE.A-465 leads by 1,359 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,166 vs #8,122
DH96NE.A-465 leads by 6,956 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,763 vs #576
DH132NC-710 leads by 6,187 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-460
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-455
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-450
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-445
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?
According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 22.90%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 is 22.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 bifacial panels?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.