Skip to main content
465 vs 455 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-455

DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465
DAS Solar
DAS-DH96NE.A-465
465 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-455
DAS Solar
DAS-DH96NE.A-455
455 Wp 22.80 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

465 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter 465 455 Difference
Module efficiency 23.30 % 22.80 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Power density 232.7 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² 5.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 465 Wp 455 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
465
15,602 kWh
455
15,266 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 465 455
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 465 W 455 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 445 W 436 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 426 W 417 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 406 W 398 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 465 455 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 465 Wp 455 Wp +10 W for 465
Module efficiency 23.30 % 22.80 % +0.50 pp for 465
Power density 232.7 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² +5.0 Wp/m² for 465
Open-circuit voltage 35.78 V 35.50 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 30.50 V 30.22 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.32 A 16.16 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.25 A 15.06 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 21.6 kg 21.6 kg Same
Weight per kWp 46.5 kg/kWp 47.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,017 vs #2,714
465 leads by 1,697 places
Power density
#1,115 vs #2,888
465 leads by 1,773 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,166 vs #1,700
465 leads by 534 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,763 vs #7,786
465 leads by 1,023 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-470
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-460
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-450
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-445
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710
12 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 or DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-455?
According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 22.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 and DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-455?
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-455 is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-455?
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-455 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 and DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-455?
DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-465 has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH96NE.A-455 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.