Skip to main content
DH132NE-645W vs DH132NC-710 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W
DAS Solar
DAS-DH132NE-645W
645 Wp 23.90 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
DAS Solar
DAS-DH132NC-710
710 Wp 22.90 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

DH132NE-645W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter DH132NE-645W DH132NC-710 Difference
Module efficiency 23.90 % 22.90 % 1.00 pp more efficient
Rated power 645 Wp 710 Wp 65 W more power
Power density 238.8 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² 10.2 Wp/m² higher
Weight 31.9 kg 38.3 kg 6.4 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 16.41 A 18.42 A 2.01 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight per kWp 49.5 kg/kWp 53.9 kg/kWp 4.5 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power 15.61 A 17.40 A 1.79 A apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DH132NE-645W
21,641 kWh
DH132NC-710
23,822 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,181 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH132NE-645W DH132NC-710
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 645 W 710 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 618 W 680 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 591 W 650 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 564 W 621 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH132NE-645W DH132NC-710 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 645 Wp 710 Wp +65 W for DH132NC-710
Module efficiency 23.90 % 22.90 % +1.00 pp for DH132NE-645W
Power density 238.8 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² +10.2 Wp/m² for DH132NE-645W
Open-circuit voltage 49.22 V 48.92 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.33 V 40.81 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.41 A 18.42 A 2.01 A apart
Current at max power 15.61 A 17.40 A 1.79 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 31.9 kg 38.3 kg -6.4 kg for DH132NE-645W
Weight per kWp 49.5 kg/kWp 53.9 kg/kWp -4.5 kg/kWp for DH132NE-645W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#351 vs #2,359
DH132NE-645W leads by 2,008 places
Power density
#356 vs #2,474
DH132NE-645W leads by 2,118 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,990 vs #8,122
DH132NE-645W leads by 5,132 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,068 vs #576
DH132NC-710 leads by 492 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
DAS Solar
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-640W
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?
According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645 W has higher module efficiency (23.90% vs 22.90%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645 W has a module efficiency of 23.90%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 is 22.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645 W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710?
DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645 W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 bifacial panels?
Both DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645 W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.