DH132NE-645W vs DH132NC-695 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695

Q: Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695?

According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W has higher module efficiency (23.90% vs 22.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695?

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W has a module efficiency of 23.90%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 is 22.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695?

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695?

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 bifacial panels?

Both DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

DAS Solar

DAS-DH132NE-645W

645 Wp 23.90 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

DAS Solar

DAS-DH132NC-695

695 Wp 22.40 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

DH132NE-645W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.50 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences

How alike are they

9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters

Parameter DH132NE-645W DH132NC-695 Difference

Module efficiency 23.90 % 22.40 % 1.50 pp more efficient

Rated power 645 Wp 695 Wp 50 W more power

Power density 238.8 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² 15.0 Wp/m² higher

Weight 31.9 kg 38.3 kg 6.4 kg lighter

Weight per kWp 49.5 kg/kWp 55.1 kg/kWp 5.7 kg/kWp lighter

Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart

Short-circuit current 16.41 A 18.30 A 1.89 A apart

Current at max power 15.61 A 17.28 A 1.67 A apart

Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm

Voltage at max power 41.33 V 40.23 V 1.10 V apart

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

DH132NE-645W

21,641 kWh

DH132NC-695

23,319 kWh

Lifetime gap

1,678 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario DH132NE-645W DH132NC-695

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 645 W 695 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 618 W 666 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 591 W 637 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 564 W 607 W

Full specification

Parameter DH132NE-645W DH132NC-695 Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 645 Wp 695 Wp +50 W for DH132NC-695

Module efficiency 23.90 % 22.40 % +1.50 pp for DH132NE-645W

Power density 238.8 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² +15.0 Wp/m² for DH132NE-645W

Open-circuit voltage 49.22 V 48.32 V Effectively the same

Voltage at max power 41.33 V 40.23 V 1.10 V apart

Short-circuit current 16.41 A 18.30 A 1.89 A apart

Current at max power 15.61 A 17.28 A 1.67 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm

Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart

Weight 31.9 kg 38.3 kg -6.4 kg for DH132NE-645W

Weight per kWp 49.5 kg/kWp 55.1 kg/kWp -5.7 kg/kWp for DH132NE-645W

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 132 132 Same

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#351 vs #4,774

DH132NE-645W leads by 4,423 places

Power density

#356 vs #4,877

DH132NE-645W leads by 4,521 places

Heat behaviour

#1,309 vs #1,309

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#2,990 vs #9,532

DH132NE-645W leads by 6,542 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#1,068 vs #1,084

DH132NE-645W leads by 16 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-715

9 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-710

9 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-705

9 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-700

9 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-650W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

DAS Solar

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-640W

One difference: module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W or DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695?

According to our database: DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645 W has higher module efficiency (23.90% vs 22.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695?

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645 W has a module efficiency of 23.90%, while DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 is 22.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W use vs DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695?

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645 W uses TOPCon cells; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695?

DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645 W has a 30 years power warranty; DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 bifacial panels?

Both DAS Solar DAS-DH132NE-645 W and DAS Solar DAS-DH132NC-695 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 DAS Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.