Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF
VS
The verdict
565-H-HC-BF-DG leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.88 pp more efficient. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
565-H-HC-BF-DG
545-H-HC-BF
Difference
Module efficiency
21.78 %
20.90 %
0.88 pp more efficient
Power density
218.7 Wp/m²
209.3 Wp/m²
9.4 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient
-0.370 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Weight
32.0 kg
29.0 kg
3.0 kg lighter
Rated power
565 Wp
545 Wp
20 W more power
Weight per kWp
56.6 kg/kWp
53.2 kg/kWp
3.4 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Short-circuit current
14.32 A
13.72 A
0.60 A apart
Module area
2.583 m²
2.604 m²
0.020 m² apart
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2296x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm vs 2296x1134x35 mm
Current at max power
13.42 A
12.82 A
0.60 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
565-H-HC-BF-DG
18,606 kWh
545-H-HC-BF
17,947 kWh
Lifetime gap
659 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
565-H-HC-BF-DG
545-H-HC-BF
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
565 W
545 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.5% of rated power
534 W
516 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
88.9% of rated power
502 W
488 W
Hot roof
70 °C
83.3% of rated power
471 W
459 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
565-H-HC-BF-DG
545-H-HC-BF
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
565 Wp
545 Wp
+20 W for 565-H-HC-BF-DG
Module efficiency
21.78 %
20.90 %
+0.88 pp for 565-H-HC-BF-DG
Power density
218.7 Wp/m²
209.3 Wp/m²
+9.4 Wp/m² for 565-H-HC-BF-DG
Open-circuit voltage
49.86 V
49.98 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
42.12 V
42.58 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.32 A
13.72 A
0.60 A apart
Current at max power
13.42 A
12.82 A
0.60 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.370 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for 545-H-HC-BF
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2296x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm vs 2296x1134x35 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
2.604 m²
0.020 m² apart
Weight
32.0 kg
29.0 kg
-3.0 kg for 545-H-HC-BF
Weight per kWp
56.6 kg/kWp
53.2 kg/kWp
-3.4 kg/kWp for 545-H-HC-BF
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,206
vs
#10,072
565-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 2,866 places
Power density
#6,841
vs
#9,997
565-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 3,156 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081
vs
#10,419
545-H-HC-BF leads by 2,662 places
Weight
#10,768
vs
#7,047
545-H-HC-BF leads by 3,721 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,810
vs
#7,640
565-H-HC-BF-DG leads by 1,830 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-580-H-HC-BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-580-H-HC-BF
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-575-H-HC-BF-DG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF-DG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Boviet Solar
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-570-H-HC-BF
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG or Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF?
According to our database: Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG has higher module efficiency (21.78% vs 20.90%); Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.350%/°C vs -0.370%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG has a module efficiency of 21.78%, while Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF is 20.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG use vs Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG uses TOPCon cells; Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF?
Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG has a 30 years power warranty; Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF bifacial panels?
Both Boviet Solar BVM7612M-565-H-HC-BF-DG and Boviet Solar BVM7612M-545-H-HC-BF are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

